Literature DB >> 23020549

A high proportion of blue light increases the photosynthesis capacity and leaf formation rate of Rosa × hybrida but does not affect time to flower opening.

Meseret Tesema Terfa1, Knut Asbjørn Solhaug, Hans Ragnar Gislerød, Jorunn Elisabeth Olsen, Sissel Torre.   

Abstract

Alterations in light quality affect plant morphogenesis and photosynthetic responses but the effects vary significantly between species. Roses exhibit an irradiance-dependent flowering control but knowledge on light quality responses is scarce. In this study we analyzed, the responses in morphology, photosynthesis and flowering of Rosa × hybrida to different blue (B) light proportions provided by light-emitting diodes (LED, high B 20%) and high pressure sodium (HPS, low B 5%) lamps. There was a strong morphological and growth effect of the light sources but no significant difference in total dry matter production and flowering. HPS-grown plants had significantly higher leaf area and plant height, yet a higher dry weight proportion was allocated to leaves than stems under LED. LED plants showed 20% higher photosynthetic capacity (Amax ) and higher levels of soluble carbohydrates. The increase in Amax correlated with an increase in leaf mass per unit leaf area, higher stomata conductance and CO2 exchange, total chlorophyll (Chl) content per area and Chl a/b ratio. LED-grown leaves also displayed a more sun-type leaf anatomy with more and longer palisade cells and a higher stomata frequency. Although floral initiation occurred at a higher leaf number in LED, the time to open flowers was the same under both light conditions. Thereby the study shows that a higher portion of B light is efficient in increasing photosynthesis performance per unit leaf area, enhancing growth and morphological changes in roses but does not affect the total Dry Matter (DM) production or time to open flower.
Copyright © Physiologia Plantarum 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23020549     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01698.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Plant        ISSN: 0031-9317            Impact factor:   4.500


  15 in total

1.  Acclimations to light quality on plant and leaf level affect the vulnerability of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to water deficit.

Authors:  Anna M Hoffmann; Georg Noga; Mauricio Hunsche
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Light-emitting diodes: whether an efficient source of light for indoor plants?

Authors:  Muzammal Rehman; Sana Ullah; Yaning Bao; Bo Wang; Dingxiang Peng; Lijun Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The Photoperiodic Flowering Time Regulator FKF1 Negatively Regulates Cellulose Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Ning Yuan; Vimal Kumar Balasubramanian; Ratan Chopra; Venugopal Mendu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 8.005

4.  Sensitivity of Seven Diverse Species to Blue and Green Light: Interactions with Photon Flux.

Authors:  M Chase Snowden; Kevin R Cope; Bruce Bugbee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Leaf Morphology, Photosynthetic Performance, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Stomatal Development of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Exposed to Different Ratios of Red Light to Blue Light.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Wei Lu; Yuxin Tong; Qichang Yang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Light Mediated Generation of Silver Nanoparticles by Spinach Thylakoids/Chloroplasts.

Authors:  Nisha Shabnam; P Sharmila; Hyunook Kim; P Pardha-Saradhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Polychromatic Supplemental Lighting from underneath Canopy Is More Effective to Enhance Tomato Plant Development by Improving Leaf Photosynthesis and Stomatal Regulation.

Authors:  Yu Song; Chengyao Jiang; Lihong Gao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  An RNA-Seq Analysis of Grape Plantlets Grown in vitro Reveals Different Responses to Blue, Green, Red LED Light, and White Fluorescent Light.

Authors:  Chun-Xia Li; Zhi-Gang Xu; Rui-Qi Dong; Sheng-Xin Chang; Lian-Zhen Wang; Muhammad Khalil-Ur-Rehman; Jian-Min Tao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Plant Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Grown Aeroponically under Different Blue- and Red-LEDs.

Authors:  Jie He; Lin Qin; Emma L C Chong; Tsui-Wei Choong; Sing Kong Lee
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Exploration of the Effects of Different Blue LED Light Intensities on Flavonoid and Lipid Metabolism in Tea Plants via Transcriptomics and Metabolomics.

Authors:  Pengjie Wang; Sirong Chen; Mengya Gu; Xiaomin Chen; Xuejin Chen; Jiangfan Yang; Feng Zhao; Naixing Ye
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.