Literature DB >> 23019587

Global climate policy impacts on livestock, land use, livelihoods, and food security.

Alla A Golub1, Benjamin B Henderson, Thomas W Hertel, Pierre J Gerber, Steven K Rose, Brent Sohngen.   

Abstract

Recent research has shed light on the cost-effective contribution that agriculture can make to global greenhouse gas abatement; however, the resulting impacts on agricultural production, producer livelihoods, and food security remain largely unexplored. This paper provides an integrated assessment of the linkages between land-based climate policies, development, and food security, with a particular emphasis on abatement opportunities and impacts in the livestock sector. Targeting Annex I countries and exempting non-Annex I countries from land-based carbon policies on equity or food security grounds may result in significant leakage rates for livestock production and agriculture as a whole. We find that such leakage can be eliminated by supplying forest carbon sequestration incentives to non-Annex I countries. Furthermore, substantial additional global agricultural abatement can be attained by extending a greenhouse gas emissions tax to non-Annex I agricultural producers, while compensating them for their additional tax expenses. Because of their relatively large emissions intensities and limited abatement possibilities, ruminant meat producers face the greatest market adjustments to land-based climate policies. We also evaluate the impacts of climate policies on livelihoods and food consumption in developing countries. In the absence of non-Annex I abatement policies, these impacts are modest. However, strong income and food consumption impacts surface because of higher food costs after forest carbon sequestration is promoted at a global scale. Food consumption among unskilled labor households falls but rises for the representative farm households, because global agricultural supplies are restricted and farm prices rise sharply in the face of inelastic food demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23019587      PMCID: PMC3876243          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108772109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  1 in total

Review 1.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Livestock and global change: emerging issues for sustainable food systems.

Authors:  Mario Herrero; Philip K Thornton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatio-temporal characteristics of livestock and their effects on pollution in China based on geographic information system.

Authors:  Ruimin Liu; Fei Xu; Yongyan Liu; Jiawei Wang; Wenwen Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Land-use and land-cover change in Western Ghats of India.

Authors:  Manish P Kale; Manoj Chavan; Satish Pardeshi; Chitiz Joshi; Prabhakar A Verma; P S Roy; S K Srivastav; V K Srivastava; A K Jha; Swapnil Chaudhari; Yogesh Giri; Y V N Krishna Murthy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint.

Authors:  Qiang Chai; Thomas Nemecek; Chang Liang; Cai Zhao; Aizhong Yu; Jeffrey A Coulter; Yifan Wang; Falong Hu; Li Wang; Kadambot H M Siddique; Yantai Gan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evaluating the regional risks to food availability and access from land-based climate policies in an integrated assessment model.

Authors:  Ryna Yiyun Cui; Stephanie Waldhoff; Leon Clarke; Nathan Hultman; Anand Patwardhan; Elisabeth A Gilmore
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2022-05-22

6.  Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation.

Authors:  Avery S Cohn; Aline Mosnier; Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; Mario Herrero; Erwin Schmid; Michael O'Hare; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States.

Authors:  Gidon Eshel; Alon Shepon; Tamar Makov; Ron Milo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Can a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Tax on Food also Be Healthy and Equitable? A Systemised Review and Modelling Study from Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors:  Christine Cleghorn; Ingrid Mulder; Alex Macmillan; Anja Mizdrak; Jonathan Drew; Nhung Nghiem; Tony Blakely; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Impact of breeding for reduced methane emissions in New Zealand sheep on maternal and health traits.

Authors:  Sharon M Hickey; Wendy E Bain; Timothy P Bilton; Gordon J Greer; Sara Elmes; Brooke Bryson; Cesar S Pinares-Patiño; Janine Wing; Arjan Jonker; Emily A Young; Kevin Knowler; Natalie K Pickering; Ken G Dodds; Peter H Janssen; John C McEwan; Suzanne J Rowe
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.772

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.