BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of children and teenagers referred to a paediatric gastroenterology centre with suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not have the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether faecal calprotectin as an 'add-on test' improves the specificity of the clinical case definition for suspected IBD in a general paediatric practice. DESIGN: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Six outpatient clinics for general paediatrics and one tertiary care hospital in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 117 children and teenagers with a clinical suspicion of IBD. DIAGNOSTIC TESTS: Faecal calprotectin was measured (index test) in all patients. Patients with a high index of suspicion on the basis of the paediatrician's global assessment, physical examination and blood results were referred for endoscopy (reference standard). Children and teenagers who were not selected for endoscopy initially were followed for half a year for the appearance of possible additional symptoms (delayed type reference standard). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The proportion of referred patients with confirmed IBD. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 14 years (range 6-18). A total of 42 (36%) had confirmed IBD. The paediatricians, who were blinded to the faecal calprotectin result, referred 68 children and teenagers for endoscopy. If they had referred only those patients with a positive faecal calprotectin result (>50 μg/g), 54 patients would have undergone endoscopy. LIMITATION: The study relied on clinical follow-up to detect missed IBD. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic strategy in general paediatric practice of using a simple clinical case definition for suspected IBD in combination with a positive faecal calprotectin result increases the specificity to detect IBD and reduces the need for referral to a paediatric gastroenterology centre with a very low risk of missing cases.
BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of children and teenagers referred to a paediatric gastroenterology centre with suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not have the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether faecal calprotectin as an 'add-on test' improves the specificity of the clinical case definition for suspected IBD in a general paediatric practice. DESIGN: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Six outpatient clinics for general paediatrics and one tertiary care hospital in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 117 children and teenagers with a clinical suspicion of IBD. DIAGNOSTIC TESTS: Faecal calprotectin was measured (index test) in all patients. Patients with a high index of suspicion on the basis of the paediatrician's global assessment, physical examination and blood results were referred for endoscopy (reference standard). Children and teenagers who were not selected for endoscopy initially were followed for half a year for the appearance of possible additional symptoms (delayed type reference standard). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The proportion of referred patients with confirmed IBD. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 14 years (range 6-18). A total of 42 (36%) had confirmed IBD. The paediatricians, who were blinded to the faecal calprotectin result, referred 68 children and teenagers for endoscopy. If they had referred only those patients with a positive faecal calprotectin result (>50 μg/g), 54 patients would have undergone endoscopy. LIMITATION: The study relied on clinical follow-up to detect missed IBD. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic strategy in general paediatric practice of using a simple clinical case definition for suspected IBD in combination with a positive faecal calprotectin result increases the specificity to detect IBD and reduces the need for referral to a paediatric gastroenterology centre with a very low risk of missing cases.
Authors: Anna Medkova; Josef Srovnal; Jarmila Potomkova; Jana Volejnikova; Vladimir Mihal Journal: World J Pediatr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.764
Authors: Gea A Holtman; Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen; Boudewijn J Kollen; Obbe F Norbruis; Johanna C Escher; Angelika Kindermann; Yolanda B de Rijke; Patrick F van Rheenen; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: R Park; S Mikami; J LeClair; A Bollom; C Lembo; S Sethi; A Lembo; M Jones; V Cheng; E Friedlander; S Nurko Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2015-03-22 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Eliza Lężyk-Ciemniak; Magdalena Tworkiewicz; Dominika Wilczyńska; Anna Szaflarska-Popławska; Aneta Krogulska Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Gea A Holtman; Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen; Andrew S Day; Ulrika L Fagerberg; Paul Henderson; Stevan T Leach; Gøri Perminow; David Mack; Patrick F van Rheenen; Els van de Vijver; David C Wilson; Johannes B Reitsma; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 26.796
Authors: Marta Velasco Rodríguez-Belvís; Javier Francisco Viada Bris; Carmen Plata Fernández; Alberto García-Salido; Julia Asensio Antón; Gloria Domínguez Ortega; Rosa Ana Muñoz Codoceo Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 2.253