Literature DB >> 23019079

Predictors of desire for help in oncology outpatients reporting pain or distress.

Kerrie Clover1, Pete Kelly, Kerry Rogers, Ben Britton, Gregory Leigh Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although effective treatments for pain and distress are available, many patients do not access them. Improved understanding of patients' desire for help may improve uptake of services.
METHODS: Data were collected as part of the QUICATOUCH screening program at an Australian regional hospital. Patients over threshold for pain were asked if they would like help with their pain and those over threshold for distress were asked if they would like help with their distress. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of desire for help.
RESULTS: Of 305 patients over threshold for pain; 59% wanted help, increasing from 13% at a pain score of one to 90% at a pain score of 10. Of 274 patients over threshold for distress, 30% wanted help, increasing from 21% at a distress score of four to 41% at a distress score of 10. Pain score was the only significant independent predictor of desire for help with pain, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.50 (95%CI 1.33-1.70) for every point increase in pain score. Distress score was the only significant independent predictor of desire for help with distress with an OR of 1.29 (95%CI 1.11-1.50) for every point increase in distress score.
CONCLUSIONS: Although desire for help with pain and distress increased with respective symptom intensity, many patients indicated they did not want help with these symptoms. Patient reluctance to seek help may constitute a barrier to realising the full potential of screening programs in reducing pain and distress.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23019079     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  5 in total

1.  Considerations about risk of ongoing distress: what can we learn from repeat screening?

Authors:  Charrlotte Seib; Mark Lazenby; Jeffrey Dunn; Suzanne Chambers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Everybody wants it done but nobody wants to do it: an exploration of the barrier and enablers of critical components towards creating a clinical pathway for anxiety and depression in cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Phyllis N Butow; Thida Thein; Tracy Robinson; Joanne M Shaw; Melanie A Price; Kerrie Clover; Tim Shaw; Peter Grimison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Predictors of enduring clinical distress in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Anna K L Reyners; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Clinical assessment of emotions in patients with cancer: Diagnostic accuracy compared with two reference standards.

Authors:  Myra E van Linde; Annemarie M J Braamse; Emma H Collette; Adriaan W Hoogendoorn; Frank J Snoek; Henk M W Verheul; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Management of Distress in Patients with Cancer-Are We Doing the Right Thing?

Authors:  Joost Dekker; Kristi D Graves; Terry A Badger; Michael A Diefenbach
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.