Literature DB >> 23018999

Is saccade averaging determined by visual processing or movement planning?

Neha Bhutani1, Supriya Ray, Aditya Murthy.   

Abstract

Saccadic averaging that causes subjects' gaze to land between the location of two targets when faced with simultaneously or sequentially presented stimuli has been often used as a probe to investigate the nature of computations that transform sensory representations into an oculomotor plan. Since saccadic movements involve at least two processing stages-a visual stage that selects a target and a movement stage that prepares the response-saccade averaging can either occur due to interference in visual processing or movement planning. By having human subjects perform two versions of a saccadic double-step task, in which the stimuli remained the same, but different instructions were provided (REDIRECT gaze to the later-appearing target vs. FOLLOW the sequence of targets in their order of appearance), we tested two alternative hypotheses. If saccade averaging were due to visual processing alone, the pattern of saccade averaging is expected to remain the same across task conditions. However, whereas subjects produced averaged saccades between two targets in the FOLLOW condition, they produced hypometric saccades in the direction of the initial target in the REDIRECT condition, suggesting that the interaction between competing movement plans produces saccade averaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23018999     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00344.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Cortical control and performance monitoring of interrupting and redirecting movements.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Aditya Murthy; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The temporal and spatial constraints of saccade planning to double-step target displacements.

Authors:  Shane Kelly; Weiwei Zhou; Sonia Bansal; Matthew S Peterson; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying the temporal control of sequential saccade planning in the frontal eye field.

Authors:  Debaleena Basu; Naveen Sendhilnathan; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Concurrent Programming of Saccades.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Rachel McCloy; Louis Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Commentary: Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jelmer de Vries
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-09

Review 7.  The programming of sequences of saccades.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Iain D Gilchrist; Rachel McCloy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The role of fixation disengagement in the parallel programming of sequences of saccades.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Iain D Gilchrist; Rachel McCloy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.