Literature DB >> 23018283

Evaluation of bioequivalence between clozapine suspension and tablet formulations : a multiple-dose, fed and fasted study.

Paul Glue1, Christopher Gale, David B Menkes, Noelyn Hung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is the most effective drug for schizophrenia. A suspension formulation of clozapine for patients who may have difficulty swallowing tablets was approved based on the 1996 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance and has been launched in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The objective of this study was to compare the bioequivalence of a new suspension formulation of clozapine with clozapine tablets (Clozaril(®)).
METHODS: The steady-state bioequivalence of a 50-mg/mL clozapine suspension and Clozaril(®) tablets was compared under fasting and fed conditions in a randomized, multiple-dose, two-way crossover study, consistent with the 2005 FDA Bioequivalence Guidance. Adult patients with schizophrenia established on once-daily doses of clozapine were administered Clozaril(®) tablets or clozapine suspension for 11 days, then switched to the other formulation for the next 11 days. On days 10 and 11 of each period, fasted (day 10) and fed (day 11) pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained over 24 h.
RESULTS: Compared with the tablet formulation, point estimates for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval (τ) [AUCτ] for the suspension formulation were close to 100 %, and all 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were between 80 % and 125 % under fasted (C(max) 99.91; 90 % CI 94.60, 104.70; AUC(τ) 99.55; 90 % CI 92.40, 100.70) and fed (C(max) 99.72; 90 % CI 93.70, 103.50; AUC(τ) 99.68; 90 % CI 93.40, 101.80) conditions. Food did not affect AUC(τ); however, C(max) was reduced by ~20 %, with a similar magnitude of change for both formulations. Safety/tolerability profiles were similar between the two formulations.
CONCLUSION: The tablet and suspension formulations are bioequivalent, with similar safety profiles, under fed and fasted conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23018283     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-012-0004-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  5 in total

1.  Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment using a multiplicative model.

Authors:  D Hauschke; V W Steinijans; E Diletti; M Burke
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

2.  Plasma clozapine and norclozapine in patients prescribed different brands of clozapine (Clozaril, Denzapine, and Zaponex).

Authors:  Lewis Couchman; Phillip Edgar Morgan; Edgar Pathrose Spencer; Atholl Johnston; Robert James Flanagan
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.

Authors:  Thomas R E Barnes
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.153

4.  Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of clozapine orally disintegrating tablet 12.5 mg: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  Anthony R Disanto; Gil Golden
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Bioequivalence of clozapine orally disintegrating 100-mg tablets compared with clozapine solid oral 100-mg tablets after multiple doses in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gil Golden; Gilbert Honigfeld
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

  5 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Alternative Routes of Administration of Clozapine.

Authors:  Siobhan Gee; David Taylor
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Steady-State Clozapine and Norclozapine Pharmacokinetics in Maori and European Patients.

Authors:  David B Menkes; Paul Glue; Christopher Gale; Frederic Lam; Cheung-Tak Hung; Noelyn Hung
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Building in-house PBPK modelling tools for oral drug administration from literature information.

Authors:  Silvia Grandoni; Nicola Cesari; Giandomenico Brogin; Paola Puccini; Paolo Magni
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2019-02-23

4.  Effects of sedative psychotropic drugs combined with oxycodone on respiratory depression in the rat.

Authors:  Lin Xu; Ashok Krishna; Sharron Stewart; Katherine Shea; Rebecca Racz; James L Weaver; Donna A Volpe; Nageswara R Pilli; Suresh Narayanasamy; Jeffry Florian; Vikram Patel; Murali K Matta; Marc B Stone; Hao Zhu; Michael C Davis; David G Strauss; Rodney Rouse
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.689

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.