Paul Glue1, Christopher Gale, David B Menkes, Noelyn Hung. 1. Department of Psychological Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand. paul.glue@otago.ac.nz
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Clozapine is the most effective drug for schizophrenia. A suspension formulation of clozapine for patients who may have difficulty swallowing tablets was approved based on the 1996 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance and has been launched in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The objective of this study was to compare the bioequivalence of a new suspension formulation of clozapine with clozapine tablets (Clozaril(®)). METHODS: The steady-state bioequivalence of a 50-mg/mL clozapine suspension and Clozaril(®) tablets was compared under fasting and fed conditions in a randomized, multiple-dose, two-way crossover study, consistent with the 2005 FDA Bioequivalence Guidance. Adult patients with schizophrenia established on once-daily doses ofclozapine were administered Clozaril(®) tablets or clozapine suspension for 11 days, then switched to the other formulation for the next 11 days. On days 10 and 11 of each period, fasted (day 10) and fed (day 11) pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained over 24 h. RESULTS: Compared with the tablet formulation, point estimates for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval (τ) [AUCτ] for the suspension formulation were close to 100 %, and all 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were between 80 % and 125 % under fasted (C(max) 99.91; 90 % CI 94.60, 104.70; AUC(τ) 99.55; 90 % CI 92.40, 100.70) and fed (C(max) 99.72; 90 % CI 93.70, 103.50; AUC(τ) 99.68; 90 % CI 93.40, 101.80) conditions. Food did not affect AUC(τ); however, C(max) was reduced by ~20 %, with a similar magnitude of change for both formulations. Safety/tolerability profiles were similar between the two formulations. CONCLUSION: The tablet and suspension formulations are bioequivalent, with similar safety profiles, under fed and fasted conditions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Clozapine is the most effective drug for schizophrenia. A suspension formulation of clozapine for patients who may have difficulty swallowing tablets was approved based on the 1996 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance and has been launched in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. The objective of this study was to compare the bioequivalence of a new suspension formulation of clozapine with clozapine tablets (Clozaril(®)). METHODS: The steady-state bioequivalence of a 50-mg/mL clozapine suspension and Clozaril(®) tablets was compared under fasting and fed conditions in a randomized, multiple-dose, two-way crossover study, consistent with the 2005 FDA Bioequivalence Guidance. Adult patients with schizophrenia established on once-daily doses of clozapine were administered Clozaril(®) tablets or clozapine suspension for 11 days, then switched to the other formulation for the next 11 days. On days 10 and 11 of each period, fasted (day 10) and fed (day 11) pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained over 24 h. RESULTS: Compared with the tablet formulation, point estimates for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosage interval (τ) [AUCτ] for the suspension formulation were close to 100 %, and all 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were between 80 % and 125 % under fasted (C(max) 99.91; 90 % CI 94.60, 104.70; AUC(τ) 99.55; 90 % CI 92.40, 100.70) and fed (C(max) 99.72; 90 % CI 93.70, 103.50; AUC(τ) 99.68; 90 % CI 93.40, 101.80) conditions. Food did not affect AUC(τ); however, C(max) was reduced by ~20 %, with a similar magnitude of change for both formulations. Safety/tolerability profiles were similar between the two formulations. CONCLUSION: The tablet and suspension formulations are bioequivalent, with similar safety profiles, under fed and fasted conditions.
Authors: Lewis Couchman; Phillip Edgar Morgan; Edgar Pathrose Spencer; Atholl Johnston; Robert James Flanagan Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Lin Xu; Ashok Krishna; Sharron Stewart; Katherine Shea; Rebecca Racz; James L Weaver; Donna A Volpe; Nageswara R Pilli; Suresh Narayanasamy; Jeffry Florian; Vikram Patel; Murali K Matta; Marc B Stone; Hao Zhu; Michael C Davis; David G Strauss; Rodney Rouse Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 4.689