Literature DB >> 23018247

Clinicopathologic features of molecular subtypes of triple negative breast cancer based on immunohistochemical markers.

Junjeong Choi1, Woo-Hee Jung, Ja Seung Koo.   

Abstract

This study was performed to identify molecular subtypes of triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) based on immunohistochemical markers. We prepared a tissue microarray from TNBC specimens of 122 patients and performed immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), claudin 3, claudin 4, claudin 7, E-cadherin, androgen receptor (AR), and gammma-glutamyltransferase (GGT1). Based on immunoreactivity, tumors were classified into basal-like (CK5/6 positive and/or EGFR positive), molecular apocrine (AR positive and/or GGT1 positive), claudin low (claudin 3, claudin 4, claudin 7 negative and/or E-cadherin negative), mixed (tumors belonging to two or more subtypes), and null (tumors not matching any other subtypes). The TNBC specimens of 122 patients included 27 basal-like (22.1%), 28 claudin low (23.0%), 12 molecular apocrine (9.8%), 23 mixed (18.9%) and 32 null (26.2%) subtype tumors. The molecular apocrine subtype showed the highest percentage of apocrine differentiation and the lowest Ki-67 labeling index (p<0.001 and p=0.040, respectively). In univariate analysis, tumor cell discohesiveness was related with shorter disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.005, and 0.002, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor cell discohesiveness was related with shorter OS and CK5/6 positivity (p=0.018), and claudin 7 positivity (p=0.019) was related with shorter DFS. In conclusion, using immunohistochemical staining for CK5/6, EGFR, claudin 3, claudin 4, claudin 7, E-cadherin, AR, and GGT1, we categorized TNBC into a basal-like subtype, a claudin low subtype, a molecular apocrine subtype, a mixed subtype showing characteristics of two different subtypes, and a null subtype not belonging to any of the subtypes identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23018247     DOI: 10.14670/HH-27.1481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histol Histopathol        ISSN: 0213-3911            Impact factor:   2.303


  21 in total

1.  Metaplastic carcinoma show different expression pattern of YAP compared to triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Min Kim; Sang Kyum Kim; Woo Hee Jung; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-25

2.  Clinicopathological Study of Triple Negative Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Gunadala Ishitha; Marie Therese Manipadam; Selvamani Backianathan; Raju Titus Chacko; Deepak Thomas Abraham; Paul Mazhuvanchary Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  The expressions of autotaxin-lysophosphatidate signaling-related proteins in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Su Jung Shim; Eunah Shin; Choong-Sik Lee; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 4.  A perspective on anti-EGFR therapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Katsuya Nakai; Mien-Chie Hung; Hirohito Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Association between oral contraceptive use as a risk factor and triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Li; Yahua Zhong; Hongyan Zhang; Haijun Yu; Yong Huang; Zheng Li; Gaili Chen; Xinying Hua
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12

6.  Prognostic relevance of biological subtype overrides that of TNM staging in breast cancer: discordance between stage and biology.

Authors:  Hyun Ae Jung; Yeon Hee Park; Moonjin Kim; Sungmin Kim; Won Jin Chang; Moon Ki Choi; Jung Yong Hong; Seok Won Kim; Won Ho Kil; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-19

Review 7.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in breast cancer (Review).

Authors:  George Iancu; Dragos Serban; Cristinel Dumitru Badiu; Ciprian Tanasescu; Mihai Silviu Tudosie; Corneliu Tudor; Daniel Ovidiu Costea; Anca Zgura; Raluca Iancu; Danut Vasile
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Expression of epithelial membrane protein (EMP) 1, EMP 2, and EMP 3 in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Kim; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Claudins as biomarkers of differential diagnosis and prognosis of tumors.

Authors:  Olga P Popova; Alla V Kuznetsova; Svetlana Yu Bogomazova; Alexey A Ivanov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Evaluation of the Expression of Amine Oxidase Proteins in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Woo Young Sun; Junjeong Choi; Yoon Jin Cha; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.