Literature DB >> 23017964

Understanding the resilience of mail-back survey methods: An analysis of 20years of change in response rates to national park surveys.

Bryan D Rookey1, Lena Le, Margaret Littlejohn, Don A Dillman.   

Abstract

Coverage and response rate challenges facing telephone and internet surveys have encouraged scientists to reconsider mail data collection methods. Although response rates to telephone surveys have declined sharply in the last 20years, it is unclear how response rates to mail have fared during this time. This study analyzes 179 mail-back surveys of visitors to US National Parks from 1988 to 2007, which used virtually the same administration procedures throughout the period. Results show that response rates, based on only those who initially agreed to return a questionnaire, have remained at a high level with a 76% average while the number of questions and pages steadily increased. Despite this rise in response burden, rates have declined only moderately from about 80% in the late 1980s to about 70% more recently. The roles of additional contacts and survey salience in maintaining high response rates are examined. Results suggest that mail-back surveys for obtaining information from quasi-general public populations remain an effective data collection procedure.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017964     DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Res        ISSN: 0049-089X


  2 in total

1.  Survey Response Rate and Quality in a Mental Health Clinic Population: Results from a Randomized Survey Comparison.

Authors:  Kelly Stolzmann; Mark Meterko; Christopher J Miller; Lindsay Belanger; Marjorie Nealon Seibert; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Gestational weight gain information: seeking and sources among pregnant women.

Authors:  Jane C Willcox; Karen J Campbell; Elizabeth A McCarthy; Martha Lappas; Kylie Ball; David Crawford; Alexis Shub; Shelley A Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.