Literature DB >> 23017652

Response randomization of one- and two-person rock-paper-scissors games in individuals with schizophrenia.

Kwangyeol Baek1, Yang-Tae Kim, Minsung Kim, Yohan Choi, Minhong Lee, Khangjune Lee, Sangjoon Hahn, Jaeseung Jeong.   

Abstract

Randomization among successive choices is important in adaptive decision-making, particularly for strategic interactions in which the optimal strategy is a mixed strategy. Patients with schizophrenia have been reported to have deficits in random sequential behaviors arising from impaired executive function. However, whether schizophrenic patients exhibit distinct behaviors for response randomization in one- and two-person games requiring different behavioral strategies is not known. The aim of this study was to examine the response randomization of 48 schizophrenic patients and 50 healthy subjects in one- and two-person rock-paper-scissors games. Here we found that the schizophrenic patients exhibited non-random biases distinct from those of the healthy subjects (i.e., stereotypic switching in the one-person game and the tendency to choose the best response against the opponent's previous choice in the two-person game). The entropy of the choice sequences was prominently decreased in the schizophrenic patients for both games, thereby indicating an overall disturbance in the behavioral randomization in adaptive decision-making. These results suggest that the impairment of response randomization in schizophrenic patients manifests differently in interactive and non-interactive situations, which may be useful for the diagnosis and quantification of the severity of the disease.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017652     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  8 in total

1.  Differences in learning retention when teaching a manual motor skill with a visual vs written instructional aide.

Authors:  Alice Cade; Matthew Sherson; Kelly Holt; Graham Dobson; Katie Pritchard; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2018-02-21

2.  Assessing behavioural profiles following neutral, positive and negative feedback.

Authors:  Rimsa Dahal; Kelsey MacLellan; Danielle Vavrek; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Neural and sympathetic activity associated with exploration in decision-making: further evidence for involvement of insula.

Authors:  Hideki Ohira; Naho Ichikawa; Kenta Kimura; Seisuke Fukuyama; Jun Shinoda; Jitsuhiro Yamada
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  The Anterior Insula Tracks Behavioral Entropy during an Interpersonal Competitive Game.

Authors:  Hideyuki Takahashi; Keise Izuma; Madoka Matsumoto; Kenji Matsumoto; Takashi Omori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.

Authors:  Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Transferring cognitive talent across domains to reduce the disposition effect in investment.

Authors:  Kristian Rotaru; Petko S Kalev; Nitin Yadav; Peter Bossaerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Negative outcomes evoke cyclic irrational decisions in Rock, Paper, Scissors.

Authors:  Benjamin James Dyson; Jonathan Michael Paul Wilbiks; Raj Sandhu; Georgios Papanicolaou; Jaimie Lintag
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Behavioural and neural modulation of win-stay but not lose-shift strategies as a function of outcome value in Rock, Paper, Scissors.

Authors:  Lewis Forder; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.