Literature DB >> 23017519

Surgical decompression is associated with decreased mortality in patients with sepsis and ureteral calculi.

Michael S Borofsky1, Dawn Walter, Ojas Shah, David S Goldfarb, Adam C Mues, Danil V Makarov.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The combination of sepsis and ureteral calculus is a urological emergency. Traditional teaching advocates urgent decompression with nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent placement, although published outcomes validating this treatment are lacking. National practice patterns for such scenarios are currently undefined. Using a retrospective study design, we defined the surgical decompression rate in patients admitted to the hospital with severe infection and ureteral calculi. We determined whether a mortality benefit is associated with this intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient demographics and hospital characteristics were extracted from the 2007 to 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified 1,712 patients with ureteral calculi and sepsis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the association between mortality and surgical decompression.
RESULTS: Of the patients 78% underwent surgical decompression. Mortality was higher in those not treated with surgical decompression (19.2% vs 8.82%, p <0.001). Lack of surgical decompression was independently associated with an increased OR of mortality even when adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities and geographic region of treatment (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Absent surgical decompression is associated with higher odds of mortality in patients with sepsis and ureteral calculi. Further research to determine predictors of surgical decompression is necessary to ensure that all patients have access to this life saving therapy.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017519     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  Emergent Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Pyonephrosis: A Primer for the On-Call Interventional Radiologist.

Authors:  Christopher Florido; Josi L Herren; Mithil B Pandhi; Matthew M Niemeyer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Acute management of stones: when to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  Helene Jung; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The prognostic performance of Sepsis-3 and SIRS criteria for patients with urolithiasis-associated sepsis transferred to ICU following surgical interventions.

Authors:  Bowen Shi; Fei Shi; Ke Xu; Liuhui Shi; Haixiao Tang; Ning Wang; Yanyuan Wu; Jun Gu; Jie Ding; Yunteng Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Predicting ureteral stones in emergency department patients with flank pain: an external validation of the STONE score.

Authors:  Natalia Hernandez; Yan Song; Vicki E Noble; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Are all urgent nephrostomies that urgent?

Authors:  Daniel Koh; Kenneth K Lau; Evonne Teoh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-03-13

6.  The impact of ureteral stent indwelling time on the treatment of acute infection caused by ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Shi; Wen-Long Ju; Yi-Ping Zhu; Shu-Jie Xia; Xiao-Wen Sun
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Early Intervention during Acute Stone Admissions: Revealing "The Weekend Effect" in Urological Practice.

Authors:  Robert H Blackwell; Gregory J Barton; Anai N Kothari; Matthew A C Zapf; Robert C Flanigan; Paul C Kuo; Gopal N Gupta
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS).

Authors:  Shreya Chugh; Amelia Pietropaolo; Emanuele Montanari; Kemal Sarica; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.