Literature DB >> 23017509

Increased water intake as a prevention strategy for recurrent urolithiasis: major impact of compliance on cost-effectiveness.

Y Lotan1, I Buendia Jiménez, I Lenoir-Wijnkoop, M Daudon, L Molinier, I Tack, M J C Nuijten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the economic impact of preventing recurrent stones using a strategy of increased water intake and determined the impact of compliance on cost-effectiveness for the French health care system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to compare costs and outcomes for recurrent kidney stone formers with less than 2 L vs 2 L or more daily fluid intake. Model assumptions included an annual prevalence of 120,000 stone episodes in France, 14.4% annual risk of stone recurrence and a 55% risk reduction in subjects with adequate water intake. Costs were based on resource use as estimated by a panel of experts and official national price lists. Outcomes were from the perspective of the public health payer, and encompassed direct and indirect costs.
RESULTS: The total cost of an episode of urolithiasis was estimated at €4,267 including the cost of treatment and complications. This corresponds to an annual budget impact of €88 million for recurrent stones based on 21,000 stone events. Assuming 100% compliance with fluid intake recommendations of 2 L daily, 11,572 new stones might be prevented, resulting in a cost savings of €49 million. Compliance with water intake in only 25% of patients would still result in 2,893 fewer stones and a cost savings of €10 million. Varying the costs of managing stones had a smaller impact on outcomes since in many patients stones do not form. Varying the incidence of complications did not change the incidence of stones and had a negligible effect on overall cost.
CONCLUSIONS: Preventing recurrent urolithiasis has a significant cost savings potential for a payer as a result of a reduced stone burden. However, compliance is an important factor in determining cost-effectiveness.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017509     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

1.  Update on the evaluation of repeated stone formers.

Authors:  Adam O Kadlec; Thomas M Turk
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Impact of LUTS on urine volume in stone formers The impact of lower urinary tract symptomatology on urine volumes in stone formers.

Authors:  Nathan Y Hoy; Nick S Dean; Jeremy Wu; Timothy A Wollin; Shubha K De
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Katsuhito Miyazawa; Allen Rodgers; Jamsheer Talati; Yair Lotan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Markers of the hydration process during fluid volume modification in women with habitual high or low daily fluid intakes.

Authors:  Evan C Johnson; Colleen X Muñoz; Laurent Le Bellego; Alexis Klein; Douglas J Casa; Carl M Maresh; Lawrence E Armstrong
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Paediatrics: A 24 h urine collection is essential in nephrolithiasis evaluation.

Authors:  Boris Chertin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Effectiveness of Treatment Modalities on Kidney Stone Recurrence.

Authors:  Anna L Zisman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  The economics of stone disease.

Authors:  Noah E Canvasser; Peter Alken; Michael Lipkin; Stephen Y Nakada; Hiren S Sodha; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Yair Lotan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Urinary Stone Disease: Advancing Knowledge, Patient Care, and Population Health.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Gregory E Tasian; Andrew L Schwaderer; David S Goldfarb; Robert A Star; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Acceptability of Mobile Health Technology for Promoting Fluid Consumption in Patients With Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper; Kathleen Lehman; David E Conroy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Role of Spiritual Sentiments in Improving the Compliance of Water Intake in Patients with Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Liaqat Ali; Saima Ali; Syed Awlad Hussain; Fayyaz Haider; Shehla Ali
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.