Literature DB >> 23016623

Prediction models of donor arrest and graft utilization in liver transplantation from maastricht-3 donors after circulatory death.

D Davila1, R Ciria, W Jassem, J Briceño, W Littlejohn, H Vilca-Meléndez, P Srinivasan, A Prachalias, J O'Grady, M Rela, N Heaton.   

Abstract

Shortage of organs for transplantation has led to the renewed interest in donation after circulatory-determination of death (DCDD). We conducted a retrospective analysis (2001-2009) and a subsequent prospective validation (2010) of liver Maastricht-Category-3-DCDD and donation-after-brain-death (DBD) offers to our program. Accepted and declined offers were compared. Accepted DCDD offers were divided into donors who went on to cardiac arrest and those who did not. Donors who arrested were divided into those producing grafts that were transplanted or remained unused. Descriptive comparisons and regression analyses were performed to assess predictor models of donor cardiac arrest and graft utilization. Variables from the multivariate analysis were prospectively validated. Of 1579 DCDD offers, 621 were accepted, and of these, 400 experienced cardiac arrest after withdrawal of support. Of these, 173 livers were transplanted. In the DCDD group, donor age < 40 years, use of inotropes and absence of gag/cough reflexes were predictors of cardiac arrest. Donor age >50 years, BMI >30, warm ischemia time >25 minutes, ITU stay >7 days and ALT ≥ 4× normal rates were risk factors for not using the graft. These variables had excellent sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of cardiac arrest (AUROC = 0.835) and graft use (AUROC = 0.748) in the 2010 prospective validation. These models can feasibly predict cardiac arrest in potential DCDDs and graft usability, helping to avoid unnecessary recoveries and healthcare expenditure. © Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23016623     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04242.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  7 in total

Review 1.  A few realistic questions raised by organ retrieval in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Olivier Lesieur; Liliane Genteuil; Maxime Leloup
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 2.  Predicting time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Authors:  Laveena Munshi; Sonny Dhanani; Sam D Shemie; Laura Hornby; Genevieve Gore; Jason Shahin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Eligibility for organ donation following end-of-life decisions: a study performed in 43 French intensive care units.

Authors:  Olivier Lesieur; Maxime Leloup; Frédéric Gonzalez; Marie-France Mamzer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Developing a donation after cardiac death risk index for adult and pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Shirin Elizabeth Khorsandi; Emmanouil Giorgakis; Hector Vilca-Melendez; John O'Grady; Michael Heneghan; Varuna Aluvihare; Abid Suddle; Kosh Agarwal; Krishna Menon; Andreas Prachalias; Parthi Srinivasan; Mohamed Rela; Wayel Jassem; Nigel Heaton
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2017-06-24

5.  When circulatory death does not come in time in potential organ donors.

Authors:  Angela Kotsopoulos; Nichon Jansen; Wilson Farid Abdo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Surgical and logistical concerns for ex vivo-based perfusion strategies for "donation after circulatory death" multiorgan recovery.

Authors:  Masaki Funamoto; Richard N Pierson; Justin H Nguyen; David A D'Alessandro
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-11-12

Review 7.  Predicting Time to Death After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Children.

Authors:  Meredith C Winter; David R Ledbetter
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.