Literature DB >> 2301637

Effects of outflow pressure and vascular volume loading on thoracic duct lymph flow in adult sheep.

R A Brace1, G J Valenzuela.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that lymph flow rate from several tissues depends on the pressure at the outflow end of the lymphatics. The left thoracic lymph duct is the largest lymphatic vessel and it transports a majority of the body's lymph. We varied outflow pressure for the left thoracic lymph duct independent of venous pressure in six unanesthetized, nonpregnant adult ewes with chronic lymphatic and venous catheters. When outflow pressure was negative, the thoracic duct lymph flow rate was independent of outflow pressure and averaged 0.040 +/- 0.004 (SE) ml.min-1.kg body wt-1. Lymph flow began to decrease with increasing outflow pressure only when outflow pressure was significantly greater than venous pressure. Above this breakpoint, lymph flow decreased linearly with outflow pressure and ceased at an outflow pressure of 25.6 +/- 4.2 mmHg. After vascular volume loading with lactated Ringer solution, steady-state thoracic duct lymph flow increased to 351 +/- 54% of control and was independent of outflow pressure when outflow pressure was negative. As outflow pressure was elevated, lymph flow began to decrease at the same breakpoint as before volume loading, and lymph flow ceased at the same outflow pressure as before volume loading. Thus this study shows that there is a plateau where thoracic duct lymph flow rate is independent of outflow pressure. In addition venous pressure under normal or volume-loaded conditions is not an impediment to thoracic duct lymph flow in unanesthetized sheep. Large increases in venous pressure are required to totally block thoracic duct lymph flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2301637     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.258.1.R240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  6 in total

1.  MRI Evaluation of Lymphatic Abnormalities in the Neck and Thorax after Fontan Surgery: Relationship with Outcome.

Authors:  David M Biko; Aaron G DeWitt; Erin M Pinto; Rodney E Morrison; Jordan A Johnstone; Heather Griffis; Michael L O'Byrne; Mark A Fogel; Matthew A Harris; Sara L Partington; Kevin K Whitehead; David Saul; David J Goldberg; Jack Rychik; Andrew C Glatz; Matthew J Gillespie; Jonathan J Rome; Yoav Dori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  The Lymphatic Circulation in Adaptations to the Fontan Circulation.

Authors:  Sabarinath Menon; Murthy Chennapragada; Shinya Ugaki; Gary F Sholler; Julian Ayer; David S Winlaw
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Regulation of amniotic fluid volume: insights derived from amniotic fluid volume function curves.

Authors:  Robert A Brace; Cecilia Y Cheung; Debra F Anderson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Functional lymphatic reserve capacity is depressed in patients with a Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Sheyanth Mohanakumar; Benjamin Kelly; Aida Luiza Ribeiro Turquetto; Mathias Alstrup; Luciana Patrick Amato; Milena Schiezari Ru Barnabe; João Bruno Dias Silveira; Fernando Amaral; Paulo Henrique Manso; Marcelo Biscegli Jatene; Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-06

5.  hCALCRL mutation causes autosomal recessive nonimmune hydrops fetalis with lymphatic dysplasia.

Authors:  Duncan I Mackie; Fuad Al Mutairi; Reema B Davis; Daniel O Kechele; Natalie R Nielsen; Joshua C Snyder; Marc G Caron; Harvey J Kliman; Jonathan S Berg; John Simms; David R Poyner; Kathleen M Caron
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 17.579

6.  Lymphatic pathway evaluation in congenital heart disease using 3D whole-heart balanced steady state free precession and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vasu D Gooty; Surendranath R Veeram Reddy; Joshua S Greer; Zachary Blair; Riad Abou Zahr; Yousef Arar; Daniel A Castellanos; Sheena Pimplawar; Gerald F Greil; Jeanne Dillenbeck; Tarique Hussain
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.