Literature DB >> 23015621

The riddle of Tasmanian languages.

Claire Bowern1.   

Abstract

Recent work which combines methods from linguistics and evolutionary biology has been fruitful in discovering the history of major language families because of similarities in evolutionary processes. Such work opens up new possibilities for language research on previously unsolvable problems, especially in areas where information from other sources may be lacking. I use phylogenetic methods to investigate Tasmanian languages. Existing materials are so fragmentary that scholars have been unable to discover how many languages are represented in the sources. Using a clustering algorithm which identifies admixture, source materials representing more than one language are identified. Using the Neighbor-Net algorithm, 12 languages are identified in five clusters. Bayesian phylogenetic methods reveal that the families are not demonstrably related; an important result, given the importance of Tasmanian Aborigines for information about how societies have responded to population collapse in prehistory. This work provides insight into the societies of prehistoric Tasmania and illustrates a new utility of phylogenetics in reconstructing linguistic history.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015621      PMCID: PMC3479735          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic structure of human populations.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg; Jonathan K Pritchard; James L Weber; Howard M Cann; Kenneth K Kidd; Lev A Zhivotovsky; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny.

Authors:  Barbara R Holland; Katharina T Huber; Vincent Moulton; Peter J Lockhart
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Rejection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution.

Authors:  Keith Hunley; Claire Bowern; Meghan Healy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.

Authors:  Daniel H Huson; David Bryant
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Curious parallels and curious connections--phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics.

Authors:  Quentin D Atkinson; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior.

Authors:  Adam Powell; Stephen Shennan; Mark G Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement.

Authors:  R D Gray; A J Drummond; S J Greenhill
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Explaining the linguistic diversity of Sahul using population models.

Authors:  Ger Reesink; Ruth Singer; Michael Dunn
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The Austronesian Basic Vocabulary Database: from bioinformatics to lexomics.

Authors:  Simon J Greenhill; Robert Blust; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 1.625

View more
  3 in total

1.  Human phylogeography and diversity.

Authors:  Alexander H Harcourt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A sketch of language history in the Korean Peninsula.

Authors:  Sean Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  TransNewGuinea.org: An Online Database of New Guinea Languages.

Authors:  Simon J Greenhill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.