Literature DB >> 23015565

Management of peri-prosthetic fracture of the humerus with severe bone loss and loosening of the humeral component after total shoulder replacement.

M D Sewell1, S N Kang, N Al-Hadithy, D S Higgs, I Bayley, M Falworth, S M Lambert.   

Abstract

There is little information about the management of peri-prosthetic fracture of the humerus after total shoulder replacement (TSR). This is a retrospective review of 22 patients who underwent a revision of their original shoulder replacement for peri-prosthetic fracture of the humerus with bone loss and/or loose components. There were 20 women and two men with a mean age of 75 years (61 to 90) and a mean follow-up 42 months (12 to 91): 16 of these had undergone a previous revision TSR. Of the 22 patients, 12 were treated with a long-stemmed humeral component that bypassed the fracture. All their fractures united after a mean of 27 weeks (13 to 94). Eight patients underwent resection of the proximal humerus with endoprosthetic replacement to the level of the fracture. Two patients were managed with a clam-shell prosthesis that retained the original components. The mean Oxford shoulder score (OSS) of the original TSRs before peri-prosthetic fracture was 33 (14 to 48). The mean OSS after revision for fracture was 25 (9 to 31). Kaplan-Meier survival using re-intervention for any reason as the endpoint was 91% (95% confidence interval (CI) 68 to 98) and 60% (95% CI 30 to 80) at one and five years, respectively. There were two revisions for dislocation of the humeral head, one open reduction for modular humeral component dissociation, one internal fixation for nonunion, one trimming of a prominent screw and one re-cementation for aseptic loosening complicated by infection, ultimately requiring excision arthroplasty. Two patients sustained nerve palsies. Revision TSR after a peri-prosthetic humeral fracture associated with bone loss and/or loose components is a salvage procedure that can provide a stable platform for elbow and hand function. Good rates of union can be achieved using a stem that bypasses the fracture. There is a high rate of complications and function is not as good as with the original replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015565     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.29248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Stefano Congia; Roberto Civinini; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25

2.  [Conservative treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures years after cemented fracture prostheses : A case series].

Authors:  H Siekmann; T S Bowen; M Huschak; F Radetzki; C Bauer; J Walther
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Is the Posterior Approach With Posterior locking compression plate and Anterior Allograft Useful and Safe in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Giovanni Vicenti; Giuseppe Solarino; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Filippo Simone; Guglielmo Ottaviani; Davide Bizzoca; Giacomo Zavattini; Domenico Zaccari; Claudio Buono; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Partial humeral replacement for peri-prosthetic fractures of the humerus.

Authors:  Ruben Manohara; Colin R Howie
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-05-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.