Literature DB >> 23015523

Interaction intimacy organizes networks of antagonistic interactions in different ways.

Mathias M Pires1, Paulo R Guimarães.   

Abstract

Interaction intimacy, the degree of biological integration between interacting individuals, shapes the ecology and evolution of species interactions. A major question in ecology is whether interaction intimacy also shapes the way interactions are organized within communities. We combined analyses of network structure and food web models to test the role of interaction intimacy in determining patterns of antagonistic interactions, such as host-parasite, predator-prey and plant-herbivore interactions. Networks describing interactions with low intimacy were more connected, more nested and less modular than high-intimacy networks. Moreover, the performance of the models differed across networks with different levels of intimacy. All models reproduced well low-intimacy networks, whereas the more elaborate models were also capable of reproducing networks depicting interactions with higher levels of intimacy. Our results indicate the key role of interaction intimacy in organizing antagonisms, suggesting that greater interaction intimacy might be associated with greater complexity in the assembly rules shaping ecological networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015523      PMCID: PMC3565795          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  23 in total

1.  Simple rules yield complex food webs.

Authors:  R J Williams; N D Martinez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Grasses and gall midges: plant defense and insect adaptation.

Authors:  M O Harris; J J Stuart; M Mohan; S Nair; R J Lamb; O Rohfritsch
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Food-web constraints on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships.

Authors:  Elisa Thébault; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system.

Authors:  A R E Sinclair; Simon Mduma; Justin S Brashares
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Stability criteria for complex ecosystems.

Authors:  Stefano Allesina; Si Tang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The probabilistic niche model reveals substantial variation in the niche structure of empirical food webs.

Authors:  Richard J Williams; Drew W Purves
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  The modularity of pollination networks.

Authors:  Jens M Olesen; Jordi Bascompte; Yoko L Dupont; Pedro Jordano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A general model for food web structure.

Authors:  Stefano Allesina; David Alonso; Mercedes Pascual
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The probabilistic niche model reveals the niche structure and role of body size in a complex food web.

Authors:  Richard J Williams; Ananthi Anandanadesan; Drew Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do food web models reproduce the structure of mutualistic networks?

Authors:  Mathias M Pires; Paulo I Prado; Paulo R Guimarães
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Patterns of interaction between Neotropical freshwater fishes and their gill Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes).

Authors:  Mariana P Braga; Sabrina B L Araújo; Walter A Boeger
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  The impact of climate change on the structure of Pleistocene food webs across the mammoth steppe.

Authors:  Justin D Yeakel; Paulo R Guimarães; Hervé Bocherens; Paul L Koch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Obligate cross-feeding expands the metabolic niche of bacteria.

Authors:  Leonardo Oña; Samir Giri; Neele Avermann; Maximilian Kreienbaum; Kai M Thormann; Christian Kost
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Coexistence of nestedness and modularity in host-pathogen infection networks.

Authors:  Sergi Valverde; Blai Vidiella; Raúl Montañez; Aurora Fraile; Soledad Sacristán; Fernando García-Arenal
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Contrasting structures of plant-mite networks compounded by phytophagous and predatory mite species.

Authors:  Walter Santos de Araújo; Rodrigo Damasco Daud
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Pleistocene megafaunal interaction networks became more vulnerable after human arrival.

Authors:  Mathias M Pires; Paul L Koch; Richard A Fariña; Marcus A M de Aguiar; Sérgio F dos Reis; Paulo R Guimarães
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Constraints and variation in food web link-species space.

Authors:  Jean P Gibert; Daniel J Wieczynski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Assembly of complex plant-fungus networks.

Authors:  Hirokazu Toju; Paulo R Guimarães; Jens M Olesen; John N Thompson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Network analyses reveal the role of large snakes in connecting feeding guilds in a species-rich Amazonian snake community.

Authors:  Daniela Pinto-Coelho; Marcio Martins; Paulo Roberto Guimarães Junior
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The network organization of protein interactions in the spliceosome is reproduced by the simple rules of food-web models.

Authors:  Mathias M Pires; Maurício Cantor; Paulo R Guimarães; Marcus A M de Aguiar; Sérgio F Dos Reis; Patricia P Coltri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.