Literature DB >> 23015429

Repetition suppression and expectation suppression are dissociable in time in early auditory evoked fields.

Ana Todorovic1, Floris P de Lange.   

Abstract

Repetition of a stimulus, as well as valid expectation that a stimulus will occur, both attenuate the neural response to it. These effects, repetition suppression and expectation suppression, are typically confounded in paradigms in which the nonrepeated stimulus is also relatively rare (e.g., in oddball blocks of mismatch negativity paradigms, or in repetition suppression paradigms with multiple repetitions before an alternation). However, recent hierarchical models of sensory processing inspire the hypothesis that the two might be separable in time, with repetition suppression occurring earlier, as a consequence of local transition probabilities, and suppression by expectation occurring later, as a consequence of learnt statistical regularities. Here we test this hypothesis in an auditory experiment by orthogonally manipulating stimulus repetition and stimulus expectation and, using magnetoencephalography, measuring the neural response over time in human subjects. We found that stimulus repetition (but not stimulus expectation) attenuates the early auditory response (40-60 ms), while stimulus expectation (but not stimulus repetition) attenuates the subsequent, intermediate stage of auditory processing (100-200 ms). These findings are well in line with hierarchical predictive coding models, which posit sequential stages of prediction error resolution, contingent on the level at which the hypothesis is generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015429      PMCID: PMC6621367          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2227-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  88 in total

1.  Predictive cues reduce but do not eliminate intrinsic response bias.

Authors:  Mingjia Hu; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

3.  Expectation and attention in hierarchical auditory prediction.

Authors:  Srivas Chennu; Valdas Noreika; David Gueorguiev; Alejandro Blenkmann; Silvia Kochen; Agustín Ibáñez; Adrian M Owen; Tristan A Bekinschtein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Theory of mind: a neural prediction problem.

Authors:  Jorie Koster-Hale; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  The Structural Correlates of Statistical Information Processing during Speech Perception.

Authors:  Isabelle Deschamps; Uri Hasson; Pascale Tremblay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Expectation Suppression Dampens Sensory Representations of Predicted Stimuli.

Authors:  Kevin S Walsh; David P McGovern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Retrieving the structure of probabilistic sequences of auditory stimuli from EEG data.

Authors:  Noslen Hernández; Aline Duarte; Guilherme Ost; Ricardo Fraiman; Antonio Galves; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Hans P Op de Beeck; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Hierarchy of prediction errors for auditory events in human temporal and frontal cortex.

Authors:  Stefan Dürschmid; Erik Edwards; Christoph Reichert; Callum Dewar; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Heidi E Kirsch; Sarang S Dalal; Leon Y Deouell; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Distinguishing Neural Adaptation and Predictive Coding Hypotheses in Auditory Change Detection.

Authors:  Renée M Symonds; Wei Wei Lee; Adam Kohn; Odelia Schwartz; Sarah Witkowski; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.