BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the feasibility of monitoring viral delivery and initial distribution to solid tumors using iodinated contrast agent and micro-computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Human BxPC-3 pancreatic tumor xenografts were established in nude mice. An oncolytic measles virus with an additional transcriptional unit encoding the sodium iodide symporter (NIS), as a reporter for viral infection, was mixed with a 1:10 dilution of Omnipaque 300 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) contrast agent and injected directly into tumors. Mice were imaged with micro-CT immediately before and after injection to determine the location of contrast agent/virus mixture. Mice were imaged again on day 3 after injection with micro-single-photon emission CT/CT to determine the location of NIS-mediated (99m) TcO(4) transport. RESULTS: A 1:10 dilution of Omnipaque had no effect on viral infectivity or cell viability in vitro and was more than adequate for CT imaging of the intratumoral injectate distribution. The volume of tumor coverage with initial CT contrast agent and the 3-day postinfection measurement of virally infected tumor volume were significantly correlated. Additionally, regions of the tumor that did not receive contrast agent from the initial injection were largely devoid of viral infection at early time points. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced viral delivery enables a rapid and accurate prediction of the initial viral distribution within a solid tumor. This technique should enable real-time monitoring of viral propagation from initially infected tumor regions to adjacent tumor regions.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the feasibility of monitoring viral delivery and initial distribution to solid tumors using iodinated contrast agent and micro-computed tomography (CT). METHODS:HumanBxPC-3pancreatic tumor xenografts were established in nude mice. An oncolytic measles virus with an additional transcriptional unit encoding the sodium iodide symporter (NIS), as a reporter for viral infection, was mixed with a 1:10 dilution of Omnipaque 300 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) contrast agent and injected directly into tumors. Mice were imaged with micro-CT immediately before and after injection to determine the location of contrast agent/virus mixture. Mice were imaged again on day 3 after injection with micro-single-photon emission CT/CT to determine the location of NIS-mediated (99m) TcO(4) transport. RESULTS: A 1:10 dilution of Omnipaque had no effect on viral infectivity or cell viability in vitro and was more than adequate for CT imaging of the intratumoral injectate distribution. The volume of tumor coverage with initial CT contrast agent and the 3-day postinfection measurement of virally infected tumor volume were significantly correlated. Additionally, regions of the tumor that did not receive contrast agent from the initial injection were largely devoid of viral infection at early time points. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced viral delivery enables a rapid and accurate prediction of the initial viral distribution within a solid tumor. This technique should enable real-time monitoring of viral propagation from initially infected tumor regions to adjacent tumor regions.
Authors: Kara L Norman; Matthew C Coffey; Kensuke Hirasawa; Douglas J Demetrick; Sandra G Nishikawa; Lisa M DiFrancesco; James E Strong; Patrick W K Lee Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: J Randolph Hecht; Rudolph Bedford; James L Abbruzzese; Sandeep Lahoti; Tony R Reid; Roy M Soetikno; David H Kirn; Scott M Freeman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas Groot-Wassink; Eric O Aboagye; Yaohe Wang; Nicholas R Lemoine; Andrew J Reader; Georges Vassaux Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: David Dingli; Kah-Whye Peng; Mary E Harvey; Philip R Greipp; Michael K O'Connor; Roberto Cattaneo; John C Morris; Stephen J Russell Journal: Blood Date: 2003-11-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M V Apte; S Park; P A Phillips; N Santucci; D Goldstein; R K Kumar; G A Ramm; M Buchler; H Friess; J A McCarroll; G Keogh; N Merrett; R Pirola; J S Wilson Journal: Pancreas Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Mi-Yeon Jung; Chetan P Offord; Matthew K Ennis; Iris Kemler; Claudia Neuhauser; David Dingli Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alan R Penheiter; Dinesh K Deelchand; Emily Kittelson; Sibel Erdogan Damgard; Stephen J Murphy; Daniel R O'Brien; William R Bamlet; Marie R Passow; Thomas C Smyrk; Fergus J Couch; George Vasmatzis; John D Port; Małgorzata Marjańska; Stephanie K Carlson Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Sarah Urnauer; Stephan Morys; Ana Krhac Levacic; Andrea M Müller; Christina Schug; Kathrin A Schmohl; Nathalie Schwenk; Christian Zach; Janette Carlsen; Peter Bartenstein; Ernst Wagner; Christine Spitzweg Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Alan R Penheiter; Sibel Erdogan; Stephen J Murphy; Steven N Hart; Joema Felipe Lima; Fariborz Rakhshan Rohakhtar; Daniel R O'Brien; William R Bamlet; Ryan E Wuertz; Thomas C Smyrk; Fergus J Couch; George Vasmatzis; Claire E Bender; Stephanie K Carlson Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 3.411