Literature DB >> 23015143

Near real time confocal microscopy of cultured amelanotic cells: sources of signal, contrast agents and limits of contrast.

C Smithpeter, A Dunn, R Drezek, T Collier, R Richards-Kortum.   

Abstract

The use of high resolution, in vivo confocal imaging for noninvasive assessment of tissue pathology may offer a clinically important adjunct to standard histopathological techniques. To augment the present understanding of both the capabilities and limitations of in vivo confocal imaging, we investigated cellular sources of image contrast in amelanotic tissues, how contrast can be enhanced with external agents and how contrast is degraded by the scattering of overlying cells. A high-resolution reflected light confocal microscope was constructed and used to obtain images of various types of unstained amelanotic cells in suspension in real time before and after the addition of contrast agents. Reflectance images were compared to phase contrast images and electron micrographs to identify morphology visible with real time reflected light confocal microscopy. Mechanisms which decrease image contrast, including interference effects and scattering in overlying layers of cells, were considered. In amelanotic epithelial cells, fluctuations in the nuclear index of refraction provide signal which can be imaged even under several overlying cell layers. Acetic acid is an external contrast agent which can enhance this nuclear backscattering. Image contrast is degraded by the presence of multiple scattering in overlying cell layers. The degradation of image contrast by cell scattering depends on the scattering phase function; in vitro models which use polystyrene microspheres to approximate tissue underestimate the actual degradation caused by cell scattering. The loss in contrast can be explained using a finite difference time domain model of cellular scattering. We conclude that near real time reflected light confocal microscopy can be used to study cell morphology in vivo. Contrast degradation due to overlying tissue is a concern and cannot adequately be modeled using conventional tissue phantoms; however, acetic acid may be used to substantially increase intrinsic contrast, allowing imaging at significant depths despite distortion from overlying layers. © 1998 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 23015143     DOI: 10.1117/1.429853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  9 in total

1.  Detection and diagnosis of oral neoplasia with an optical coherence microscope.

Authors:  A L Clark; A Gillenwater; R Alizadeh-Naderi; A K El-Naggar; R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Contribution to comprehension of image formation in confocal microscopy of cornea with Rostock cornea module.

Authors:  R Bochert; A Zhivov; R Kraak; J Stave; R F Guthoff
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Reflection-contrast limit of fiber-optic image guides.

Authors:  Pierre M Lane; Calum E MacAulay
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  In vivo imaging of oral neoplasia using a miniaturized fiber optic confocal reflectance microscope.

Authors:  Kristen C Maitland; Ann M Gillenwater; Michelle D Williams; Adel K El-Naggar; Michael R Descour; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 5.  Inorganic nanoparticles in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sanjib Bhattacharyya; Rachel A Kudgus; Resham Bhattacharya; Priyabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Confocal mosaicing microscopy in skin excisions: a demonstration of rapid surgical pathology.

Authors:  D S Gareau; Y G Patel; Y Li; I Aranda; A C Halpern; K S Nehal; M Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Aorta fluorescence imaging by using confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Chun-Yang Wang; Jui-Che Tsai; Ching-Cheng Chuang; Yao-Sheng Hsieh; Chia-Wei Sun
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-09

8.  Confocal microscopy of unfixed breast needle core biopsies: a comparison to fixed and stained sections.

Authors:  Linda M Schiffhauer; J Neil Boger; Thomas A Bonfiglio; James M Zavislan; Margarita Zuley; Christi Alessi Fox
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP imaging, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Maddalena T Tilli; Angela R Parrish; Ion Cotarla; Laundette P Jones; Michael D Johnson; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.