PURPOSE: Targeted therapies using the anti-EGFR antibodies panitumumab (Pmab) or cetuximab (Cmab) are currently restricted to patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma whose tumours do not show a mutation in KRAS. However, recent retrospective studies indicated that patients with tumours mutated in codon 13 of KRAS may benefit from treatment with Cmab in contrast to patients with tumours mutated in KRAS codon 12. METHODS: To study the functional impact of the subtype of KRAS mutations on the efficiency of EGFR-targeted therapies, we correlated the KRAS mutation status of 15 colorectal carcinoma cell lines with the in vitro sensitivity of these cells to Cmab/Pmab. Mutations in the potential predictive biomarkers BRAF and PIK3CA as well as protein expression of EGFR and PTEN were also determined. RESULTS: Four out of seven KRAS-mutated cell lines were characterised by the p.G13D mutation. Treatment of these cells using Cmab/Pmab induced a significant growth inhibition in contrast to cell lines showing a KRAS mutation at codon 12 or 61. Out of the eight KRAS wild-type cell lines, five were insensitive to Cmab/Pmab. These cell lines were characterised either by BRAF mutation or by absence of EGFR or PTEN protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: Since KRAS p.G13D-mutated tumour cells may respond to EGFR-targeted therapy, we suggest including subtype analysis of KRAS mutations in prospective clinical trials. In KRAS wild-type tumour cells, BRAF mutations and loss of EGFR or PTEN expression may lead to resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy and should be considered as additional negative predictive biomarkers.
PURPOSE: Targeted therapies using the anti-EGFR antibodies panitumumab (Pmab) or cetuximab (Cmab) are currently restricted to patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma whose tumours do not show a mutation in KRAS. However, recent retrospective studies indicated that patients with tumours mutated in codon 13 of KRAS may benefit from treatment with Cmab in contrast to patients with tumours mutated in KRAS codon 12. METHODS: To study the functional impact of the subtype of KRAS mutations on the efficiency of EGFR-targeted therapies, we correlated the KRAS mutation status of 15 colorectal carcinoma cell lines with the in vitro sensitivity of these cells to Cmab/Pmab. Mutations in the potential predictive biomarkers BRAF and PIK3CA as well as protein expression of EGFR and PTEN were also determined. RESULTS: Four out of seven KRAS-mutated cell lines were characterised by the p.G13D mutation. Treatment of these cells using Cmab/Pmab induced a significant growth inhibition in contrast to cell lines showing a KRAS mutation at codon 12 or 61. Out of the eight KRAS wild-type cell lines, five were insensitive to Cmab/Pmab. These cell lines were characterised either by BRAF mutation or by absence of EGFR or PTEN protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: Since KRASp.G13D-mutated tumour cells may respond to EGFR-targeted therapy, we suggest including subtype analysis of KRAS mutations in prospective clinical trials. In KRAS wild-type tumour cells, BRAF mutations and loss of EGFR or PTEN expression may lead to resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy and should be considered as additional negative predictive biomarkers.
Authors: Wendy De Roock; Derek J Jonker; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Dongsheng Tu; Salvatore Siena; Simona Lamba; Sabrina Arena; Milo Frattini; Hubert Piessevaux; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris J O'Callaghan; Shirin Khambata-Ford; John R Zalcberg; John Simes; Christos S Karapetis; Alberto Bardelli; Sabine Tejpar Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karl-Ludwig Schaefer; Kristin Brachwitz; Yvonne Braun; Raihanatou Diallo; Daniel H Wai; Susanne Zahn; Dominik T Schneider; Cornelius Kuhnen; Arabel Vollmann; Gero Brockhoff; Helmut E Gabbert; Christopher Poremba Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: I Alldinger; K L Schaefer; D Goedde; L Ottaviano; U Dirksen; A Ranft; H Juergens; H E Gabbert; W T Knoefel; C Poremba Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Stephan E Baldus; Karl-L Schaefer; Rainer Engers; Dinah Hartleb; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Helmut E Gabbert Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: F Di Fiore; F Blanchard; F Charbonnier; F Le Pessot; A Lamy; M P Galais; L Bastit; A Killian; R Sesboüé; J J Tuech; A M Queuniet; B Paillot; J C Sabourin; F Michot; P Michel; T Frebourg Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: F Loupakis; A Ruzzo; C Cremolini; B Vincenzi; L Salvatore; D Santini; G Masi; I Stasi; E Canestrari; E Rulli; I Floriani; K Bencardino; N Galluccio; V Catalano; G Tonini; M Magnani; G Fontanini; F Basolo; A Falcone; F Graziano Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Carlos Gil Ferreira; Veronica Aran; Ilana Zalcberg-Renault; Ana Paula Victorino; Jonas H Salem; Martin H Bonamino; Fernando M Vieira; Mariano Zalis Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Yu Imamura; Paul Lochhead; Mai Yamauchi; Aya Kuchiba; Zhi Rong Qian; Xiaoyun Liao; Reiko Nishihara; Seungyoun Jung; Kana Wu; Katsuhiko Nosho; Yaoyu E Wang; Shouyong Peng; Adam J Bass; Kevin M Haigis; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Min Seob Kwak; Jae Myung Cha; Jin Young Yoon; Jung Won Jeon; Hyun Phil Shin; Hye Jung Chang; Hyung Kyung Kim; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 1.889