Literature DB >> 23014081

Evaluation of survival of 3 different fixed space maintainers.

Emine Sen Tunc1, Sule Bayrak, Nuray Tuloglu, Turkan Egilmez, Devrim Isci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide a comparative evaluation of the survival times and failure rates of different types of fixed space maintainers (SMs).
METHODS: A total of 30 4- to 10-year-olds were selected for the study. Children were divided into 3 groups, according to type of SM, namely: band and loop (B&L), direct bonded (DB), and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC). Patients were recalled once every 3 months for clinical evaluation for 1 year or until failure. The survival times of SMs were estimated by means of the Kaplan-Meier method, and confounding factors were investigated using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Mean survival time was highest for B&L SMs (11.20 months), followed by DB SMs (9.20 months) and FRC SMs (6.70 months). There were statistically significant differences noted between types of SMs (log rank=11.99; P=.002). The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that age, sex, dental arch, and side of the jaw were not significantly correlated with "success of SMs" (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Band and loop fixed space maintainers showed superior performance in terms of both survival time and success rates versus direct bonded and fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23014081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dental arch spatial changes after premature loss of first primary molars: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Dimitra Lazaridou; Dimitra Tsiantou; Nikolaos Kotsanos; Athanasios E Athanasiou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition - a clinical guide.

Authors:  E Watt; A Ahmad; R Adamji; A Katsimpali; P Ashley; J Noar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Clinical success and longevity of band and loop compared to crown and loop space maintainers.

Authors:  M A Qudeimat; I S Sasa
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-03-19

4.  New Design for an Adjustable Cise Space Maintainer.

Authors:  Nurhat Ozkalayci; Mehmet Yetmez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review.

Authors:  Mahesh Ramakrishnan; R Dhanalakshmi; E M G Subramanian
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-02-14

Review 6.  Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shantanu S Deshpande; Vikas D Bendgude; Vivian V Kokkali
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Comparison of the longevity of prefabricated and conventional band and loops in children's primary teeth.

Authors:  Dana Tahririan; Milad Safaripour; Alireza Eshghi; Amir Hossein Bonyadian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 8.  Clinical Effectiveness of Fiber-reinforced Composite Space Maintainer and Band and Loop Space Maintainer in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henpu Kamki; Ritesh Kalaskar; Shruti Balasubramanian; Hemraj Badhe; Ashita Kalaskar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021

Review 9.  Digitainers-Digital Space Maintainers: A Review.

Authors:  Kiran Gs Dhanotra; Rupinder Bhatia
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021

Review 10.  Methods of space maintenance for premature loss of a primary molar: a review.

Authors:  A J Ahmad; S Parekh; P F Ashley
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-09-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.