Literature DB >> 2301393

Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.

N Risch1.   

Abstract

The power to detect disease-susceptibility loci through linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives and affected-unaffected pairs is examined. Allelic identity by descent (ibd) for a completely polymorphic marker for sibling, uncle-nephew, grandparent-grandchild, half-sib, and first-cousin pairs is considered. Affected-unaffected pairs generally represent a poor strategy. For single-locus models, ibd depends on lambda R, the risk ratio for type R relatives compared with population prevalence, and the recombination fraction theta. The ibd for grandparent-grandchild pairs is least affected by recombination, followed by sibs, half-sib, uncle-nephew, and first-cousin pairs. For diseases with large lambda values and for small theta values, distant relatives offer greater power. For larger theta values, grandparent-grandchild pairs are best; for small lambda values, sibs are best. Additive and multiplicative multilocus models are considered. For the multiplicative model, the same formulas as in the single-locus model apply, except that lambda iR (for the ith contributing locus) is substituted for lambda R. For the additive model, the deviation from null expectation for ibd is divided among all contributing loci. Compared with the multiplicative model, for an additive model there is usually greater advantage in distant relationships. Multipoint analysis using linked marker loci for affected relative pairs is described. Simultaneous use of multiple markers diminishes the effect of recombination and allows for localization of the disease-susceptibility locus.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2301393      PMCID: PMC1684989     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  12 in total

1.  The power of identity-by-state methods for linkage analysis.

Authors:  D T Bishop; J A Williamson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The histocompatibility system in juvenile, insulin-dependent diabetic multiplex kindreds.

Authors:  J Barbosa; R King; H Noreen; E J Yunis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Protein antigen-monoclonal antibody contact sites investigated by limited proteolysis of monoclonal antibody-bound antigen: protein "footprinting".

Authors:  H Sheshberadaran; L G Payne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Segregation and linkage analysis of nine Utah breast cancer pedigrees.

Authors:  D T Bishop; L Cannon-Albright; T McLellan; E J Gardner; M H Skolnick
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Assessing the role of HLA-linked and unlinked determinants of disease.

Authors:  N Risch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Relatives of probands: models for preliminary genetic analysis.

Authors:  M A Campbell; R C Elston
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer: segregation analysis of 200 Danish pedigrees.

Authors:  W R Williams; D E Anderson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.

Authors:  B K Suarez; J Rice; T Reich
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Risk of breast cancer to relatives of young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A G Schwartz; M C King; S H Belle; W A Satariano; G M Swanson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Linkage analysis between the major histocompatibility system and insulin-dependent diabetes in families with patients in two consecutive generations.

Authors:  J Barbosa; M M Chern; V E Anderson; H Noreen; S Johnson; N Reinsmoen; R McCarty; R King; L Greenberg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  198 in total

1.  Relative power of linkage and transmission disequilibrium test strategies to detect non-HLA linked coeliac disease susceptibility genes.

Authors:  S Bevan; S Popat; R S Houlston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  A general conditional-logistic model for affected-relative-pair linkage studies.

Authors:  J M Olson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The future of psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  M T Tsuang; S V Faraone
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Model-free linkage analysis with covariates confirms linkage of prostate cancer to chromosomes 1 and 4.

Authors:  K A Goddard; J S Witte; B K Suarez; W J Catalona; J M Olson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A paradigm for finding genes for a complex human trait: polycystic ovary syndrome and follistatin.

Authors:  K Odunsi; K K Kidd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Contribution of the MHC region to the familial risk of coeliac disease.

Authors:  S Bevan; S Popat; C P Braegger; A Busch; D O'Donoghue; K Falth-Magnusson; A Ferguson; A Godkin; L Hogberg; G Holmes; K B Hosie; P D Howdle; H Jenkins; D Jewell; S Johnston; N P Kennedy; G Kerr; P Kumar; R F Logan; A H Love; M Marsh; C J Mulder; K Sjoberg; L Stenhammer; J Walker-Smith; A M Marossy; R S Houlston
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.

Authors:  H J Cordell; G C Wedig; K B Jacobs; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Multipoint linkage analysis of the pseudoautosomal regions, using affected sibling pairs.

Authors:  J Dupuis; P Van Eerdewegh
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06-26       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.

Authors:  S M Leal; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.

Authors:  B A Rybicki; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.