BACKGROUND: In dogs, flea infestation (FI), flea bite hypersensitivity (FBH) and canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) have been mainly characterized by their lesions but never by their pruritus. In clinical practice, many of these dogs exhibit only pruritus. HYPOTHESIS/ OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of pruritus in these dermatoses and their potential usefulness for diagnosis. ANIMALS: Dogs included were selected from the Oniris clinical data. Cases were selected in which the dogs had only one of the three dermatoses diagnosed. The diagnosis of CAD was based on Prélaud's criteria and positive intradermal tests except flea; for FBH by compatible clinical signs and a response to an intradermal test with flea allergen; and for FI by the presence of fleas. Moreover, in each group, other primary pruritic skin diseases were excluded. METHODS: Location, behavioural manifestations, seasonality and quantification of the pruritus were evaluated. The statistical analysis used chi-squared test with a P-value <0.05. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-six dogs were analysed, 91 with CAD, 110 FI and 145 FBH. The period (season) of onset was not statistically different either for each dermatosis or among the three dermatoses. Some locations were highly specific for one dermatosis as follows: ventral abdomen/medial surface of thigh (chewing) and radius/carpus/tibia/tarsus (chewing) in FI; back/dorsolumbar area (chewing) and tail (chewing) in FBH; and paws (chewing/licking) and face/neck (rubbing) in CAD. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Some features of pruritus could be suggestive of the causal disease, with possible diagnostic value in pruritic dogs.
BACKGROUND: In dogs, flea infestation (FI), flea bite hypersensitivity (FBH) and canineatopic dermatitis (CAD) have been mainly characterized by their lesions but never by their pruritus. In clinical practice, many of these dogs exhibit only pruritus. HYPOTHESIS/ OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of pruritus in these dermatoses and their potential usefulness for diagnosis. ANIMALS: Dogs included were selected from the Oniris clinical data. Cases were selected in which the dogs had only one of the three dermatoses diagnosed. The diagnosis of CAD was based on Prélaud's criteria and positive intradermal tests except flea; for FBH by compatible clinical signs and a response to an intradermal test with flea allergen; and for FI by the presence of fleas. Moreover, in each group, other primary pruritic skin diseases were excluded. METHODS: Location, behavioural manifestations, seasonality and quantification of the pruritus were evaluated. The statistical analysis used chi-squared test with a P-value <0.05. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-six dogs were analysed, 91 with CAD, 110 FI and 145 FBH. The period (season) of onset was not statistically different either for each dermatosis or among the three dermatoses. Some locations were highly specific for one dermatosis as follows: ventral abdomen/medial surface of thigh (chewing) and radius/carpus/tibia/tarsus (chewing) in FI; back/dorsolumbar area (chewing) and tail (chewing) in FBH; and paws (chewing/licking) and face/neck (rubbing) in CAD. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Some features of pruritus could be suggestive of the causal disease, with possible diagnostic value in pruriticdogs.
Authors: Petr Fisara; Roger M Sargent; Michael Shipstone; Andrew von Berky; Janet von Berky Journal: Vet Dermatol Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 1.589
Authors: Ariele A Ferreira; Rodrigo Friesen; Juliana K Oliveira; William Timboni Teixeira; Thiago Sillas; Juliana Werner; Jorge Luiz Costa Castro; Peterson T Dornbusch Journal: Open Vet J Date: 2019-04-03