BACKGROUND: Data from the memberships of large, integrated health care systems can be valuable for clinical, epidemiologic, and health services research, but a potential selection bias may threaten the inference to the population of interest. METHODS: We reviewed administrative records of members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) in 2000 and 2010, and we compared their sociodemographic characteristics with those of the underlying population in the coverage area on the basis of US Census Bureau data. RESULTS: We identified 3,328,579 KPSC members in 2000 and 3,357,959 KPSC members in 2010, representing approximately 16% of the population in the coverage area. The distribution of sex and age of KPSC members appeared to be similar to the census reference population in 2000 and 2010 except with a slightly higher proportion of 40 to 64 year olds. The proportion of Hispanics/Latinos was comparable between KPSC and the census reference population (37.5% vs 38.2%, respectively, in 2000 and 45.2% vs 43.3% in 2010). However, KPSC members included more blacks (14.9% vs 7.0% in 2000 and 10.8% vs 6.5% in 2010). Neighborhood educational levels and neighborhood household incomes were generally similar between KPSC members and the census reference population, but with a marginal underrepresentation of individuals with extremely low income and high education. CONCLUSIONS: The membership of KPSC reflects the socioeconomic diversity of the Southern California census population, suggesting that findings from this setting may provide valid inference for clinical, epidemiologic, and health services research.
BACKGROUND: Data from the memberships of large, integrated health care systems can be valuable for clinical, epidemiologic, and health services research, but a potential selection bias may threaten the inference to the population of interest. METHODS: We reviewed administrative records of members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) in 2000 and 2010, and we compared their sociodemographic characteristics with those of the underlying population in the coverage area on the basis of US Census Bureau data. RESULTS: We identified 3,328,579 KPSC members in 2000 and 3,357,959 KPSC members in 2010, representing approximately 16% of the population in the coverage area. The distribution of sex and age of KPSC members appeared to be similar to the census reference population in 2000 and 2010 except with a slightly higher proportion of 40 to 64 year olds. The proportion of Hispanics/Latinos was comparable between KPSC and the census reference population (37.5% vs 38.2%, respectively, in 2000 and 45.2% vs 43.3% in 2010). However, KPSC members included more blacks (14.9% vs 7.0% in 2000 and 10.8% vs 6.5% in 2010). Neighborhood educational levels and neighborhood household incomes were generally similar between KPSC members and the census reference population, but with a marginal underrepresentation of individuals with extremely low income and high education. CONCLUSIONS: The membership of KPSC reflects the socioeconomic diversity of the Southern California census population, suggesting that findings from this setting may provide valid inference for clinical, epidemiologic, and health services research.
Authors: Corinna Koebnick; Ning Smith; Karen J Coleman; Darios Getahun; Kristi Reynolds; Virginia P Quinn; Amy H Porter; Jack K Der-Sarkissian; Steven J Jacobsen Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ning Smith; Rajan L Iyer; Annette Langer-Gould; Darios T Getahun; Daniel Strickland; Steven J Jacobsen; Wansu Chen; Stephen F Derose; Corinna Koebnick Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Matthew D McElvany; Priscilla H Chan; Heather A Prentice; Elizabeth W Paxton; Mark T Dillon; Ronald A Navarro Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Ted R Mikuls; T Craig Cheetham; Gerald D Levy; Nazia Rashid; Artak Kerimian; Kimberly J Low; Brian W Coburn; David T Redden; Kenneth G Saag; P Jeffrey Foster; Lang Chen; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Am J Med Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Heejoo Jo; Sandrah P Eckel; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Myles Cockburn; Mayra P Martinez; Ting Chow; Fred Lurmann; William E Funk; Rob McConnell; Anny H Xiang Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Shawna B Christensen; Mary Helen Black; Ning Smith; Mayra M Martinez; Steve J Jacobsen; Amy H Porter; Corinna Koebnick Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Sara Y Tartof; Jennifer L Kuntz; Lie H Chen; Rong Wei; Laura Puzniak; Yun Tian; Theresa M Im; Harpreet S Takhar; Sanjay Merchant; Thomas Lodise Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-10-05
Authors: Annette Langer-Gould; Jessica B Smith; Kathleen B Albers; Anny H Xiang; Jun Wu; Erica H Kerezsi; Keeli McClearnen; Edlin G Gonzales; Amethyst D Leimpeter; Stephen K Van Den Eeden Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lauren P Wallner; Julia R DiBello; Bonnie H Li; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Sheila Weinmann; Debra P Ritzwoller; Jill E Abell; Ralph D'Agostino; Ronald K Loo; David S Aaronson; Ralph I Horwitz; Steven J Jacobsen Journal: Urology Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 2.649