Literature DB >> 23012483

Fetal cerebral imaging - ultrasound vs. MRI: an update.

Eléonore Blondiaux1, Catherine Garel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the advantages and limitations of prenatal ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of the fetal brain. These imaging modalities should not be seen as competitive but rather as complementary. There are wide variations in the world regarding screening policies, technology, skills, and legislation about termination of pregnancy, and these variations markedly impact on the way of using prenatal imaging. According to the contribution expected from each technique and to local working conditions, one should choose the most appropriate imaging modality on a case-by-case basis. The advantages and limitations of US and MRI in the setting of fetal brain imaging are displayed. Different anatomical regions (midline, ventricles, subependymal area, cerebral parenchyma, pericerebral space, posterior fossa) and pathological conditions are analyzed and illustrated in order to compare the respective contribution of each technique. An accurate prenatal diagnosis of cerebral abnormalities is of utmost importance for prenatal counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prenatal diagnosis; fetal brain; fetal diseases; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23012483     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  10 in total

1.  Ultrasound diagnosis of bilateral cataracts in a fetus with possible cerebro-ocular congential muscular dystrophy during the routine second trimester anomaly scan.

Authors:  Alexandra Drought; Ruwan Wimalasundera; Susan Holder
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of gastrointestinal fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Matteo Saldari; Silvia Bernardo; Valeria Vinci; Camilla Aliberti; Paolo Sollazzo; Antonella Giancotti; Federica Capozza; Maria G Porpora; Denis A Cozzi; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Normal fetal posterior fossa in MR imaging: new biometric data and possible clinical significance.

Authors:  R Ber; O Bar-Yosef; C Hoffmann; D Shashar; R Achiron; E Katorza
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  [Fetal MRI and ultrasound of congenital CNS anomalies].

Authors:  I Pogledic; G Meyberg-Solomayer; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  The Gini coefficient: a methodological pilot study to assess fetal brain development employing postmortem diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Adrian Viehweger; Till Riffert; Bibek Dhital; Thomas R Knösche; Alfred Anwander; Holger Stepan; Ina Sorge; Wolfgang Hirsch
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10

6.  Volumetric MRI study of the intrauterine growth restriction fetal brain.

Authors:  A Polat; S Barlow; R Ber; R Achiron; E Katorza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Quantification of Intracranial Structures Volume in Fetuses Using 3-D Volumetric MRI: Normal Values at 19 to 37 Weeks' Gestation.

Authors:  Jing-Ya Ren; Ming Zhu; Guanghai Wang; Yiding Gui; Fan Jiang; Su-Zhen Dong
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Prenatal brain MRI of fetuses with Zika virus infection.

Authors:  Prisca Guillemette-Artur; Marianne Besnard; Dominique Eyrolle-Guignot; Jean-Marie Jouannic; Catherine Garel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  Association of gestational age with MRI-based biometrics of brain development in fetuses.

Authors:  Yuequan Shi; Yunjing Xue; Chunxia Chen; Kaiwu Lin; Zuofu Zhou
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Reference biometry of foetal brain by prenatal MRI and the distribution of measurements in foetuses with ventricular septal defect.

Authors:  Feng Xia; Yu Guo; Hua He; Peiwen Chen; Jianbo Shao; Wei Xia
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.