BACKGROUND: Doripenem is a group 2 carbapenem with enhanced in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There is a paucity of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data on doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 doses of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and provide probability estimates of attaining effective drug exposure against common gram-negative pathogens. METHODS: We obtained multiple blood samples from 12 adults with febrile neutropenia who were receiving either 500 mg or 1000 mg ofintravenous doripenem over 4 hours every 8 hours. Following at least 2 doses, serum concentrations were measured in each subject at 1, 4, 6, and 8 hours after initiation of a dose by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The derived pharmacokinetic parameters from these serum levels were used to perform a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation against bacteria with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.008-64 mg/L to determine probability estimates of the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT(>MIC)). RESULTS: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters in these patients were a volume of distribution of 43.9 L, an elimination rate constant of 0.37 h(-1), a total clearance of 14.4 L/h, and an area under the concentration-time curve of 57.6 mg•h/L. An optimal probability of target attainment (40% fT(>MIC)) of 90% was obtained against bacteria with MICs ≤2 mg/L and ≤4 mg/L with 500-mg and 1000-mg doses, respectively. Adverse events associated with doripenem were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this analysis of doripenem suggest that higher doses, as well as prolonged infusions, may be necessary to optimally treat selected gram-negative bacteria (eg, P. aeruginosa) in patients with febrile neutropenia.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Doripenem is a group 2 carbapenem with enhanced in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There is a paucity of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data on doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 doses of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and provide probability estimates of attaining effective drug exposure against common gram-negative pathogens. METHODS: We obtained multiple blood samples from 12 adults with febrile neutropenia who were receiving either 500 mg or 1000 mg of intravenous doripenem over 4 hours every 8 hours. Following at least 2 doses, serum concentrations were measured in each subject at 1, 4, 6, and 8 hours after initiation of a dose by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The derived pharmacokinetic parameters from these serum levels were used to perform a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation against bacteria with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.008-64 mg/L to determine probability estimates of the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT(>MIC)). RESULTS: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters in these patients were a volume of distribution of 43.9 L, an elimination rate constant of 0.37 h(-1), a total clearance of 14.4 L/h, and an area under the concentration-time curve of 57.6 mg•h/L. An optimal probability of target attainment (40% fT(>MIC)) of 90% was obtained against bacteria with MICs ≤2 mg/L and ≤4 mg/L with 500-mg and 1000-mg doses, respectively. Adverse events associated with doripenem were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this analysis of doripenem suggest that higher doses, as well as prolonged infusions, may be necessary to optimally treat selected gram-negative bacteria (eg, P. aeruginosa) in patients with febrile neutropenia.
Authors: Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Azrin N Abd Rahman; Mohd-Basri Mat-Nor; Helmi Sulaiman; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Christine E Staatz Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kristen Nichols; Eun Kyoung Chung; Chad A Knoderer; Lauren E Buenger; Daniel P Healy; Jennifer Dees; Ashley S Crumby; Michael B Kays Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 5.191