Literature DB >> 23012253

Scoring treatment response in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

M P Sormani1, J Rio, M Tintorè, A Signori, D Li, P Cornelisse, B Stubinski, M l Stromillo, X Montalban, N De Stefano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We employed clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures in combination, to assess patient responses to interferon in multiple sclerosis.
OBJECTIVE: To optimize and validate a scoring system able to discriminate responses to interferon treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
METHODS: Our analysis included two large, independent datasets of RRMS patients who were treated with interferons that included 4-year follow-up data. The first dataset ("training set") comprised of 373 RRMS patients from a randomized clinical trial of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a. The second ("validation set") included an observational cohort of 222 RRMS patients treated with different interferons. The new scoring system, a modified version of that previously proposed by Rio et al., was first tested on the training set, then validated using the validation set. The association between disability progression and risk group, as defined by the score, was evaluated by Kaplan Meier survival curves and Cox regression, and quantified by hazard ratios (HRs).
RESULTS: The score (0-3) was based on the number of new T2 lesions (>5) and clinical relapses (0,1 or 2) during the first year of therapy. The risk of disability progression increased with higher scores. In the validation set, patients with score of 0 showed a 3-year progression probability of 24%, while those with a score of 1 increased to 33% (HR = 1.56; p = 0.13), and those with score greater than or equal to 2 increased to 65% (HR = 4.60; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We report development of a simple, quantitative and complementary tool for predicting responses in interferon-treated patients that could help clinicians make treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23012253     DOI: 10.1177/1352458512460605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  72 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis--establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Àlex Rovira; David Miller; Tarek A Yousry; Maria P Sormani; Maria P de Stefano; Mar Tintoré; Cristina Auger; Carmen Tur; Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Franz Fazekas; Ludwig Kappos; Chris Polman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Advances in and Algorithms for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jens Ingwersen; Orhan Aktas; Hans-Peter Hartung
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  [Current immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  F Paul; K Ruprecht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis - insights from real-world observational studies.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Improved Detection of New MS Lesions during Follow-Up Using an Automated MR Coregistration-Fusion Method.

Authors:  A Galletto Pregliasco; A Collin; A Guéguen; M A Metten; J Aboab; R Deschamps; O Gout; L Duron; J C Sadik; J Savatovsky; A Lecler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Towards the implementation of 'no evidence of disease activity' in multiple sclerosis treatment: the multiple sclerosis decision model.

Authors:  Martin Stangel; Iris Katharina Penner; Boris A Kallmann; Carsten Lukas; Bernd C Kieseier
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 7.  [Real-world evidence : Benefits and limitations in multiple sclerosis research].

Authors:  T Ziemssen; D Rothenbacher; J Kuhle; T Berger
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 8.  Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: A clinical and MRI challenge.

Authors:  Claudio Gasperini; Luca Prosperini; Mar Tintoré; Maria Pia Sormani; Massimo Filippi; Jordi Rio; Jacqueline Palace; Maria A Rocca; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Hugo Vrenken; Jette L Frederiksen; Tarek A Yousry; Christian Enzinger; Alex Rovira; Ludwig Kappos; Carlo Pozzilli; Xavier Montalban; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Current and Emerging Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for the Radiologist, Part 2-Surveillance for Treatment Complications and Disease Progression.

Authors:  C McNamara; G Sugrue; B Murray; P J MacMahon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Imaging as an Outcome Measure in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Daniel Ontaneda; Robert J Fox
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.