Literature DB >> 23012120

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Communication.

J Austoker1, L Giordano, P Hewitson, P Villain.   

Abstract

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on communication includes 35 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of screening programmes and services. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23012120     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication.

Authors:  L von Karsa; J Patnick; N Segnan; W Atkin; S Halloran; I Lansdorp-Vogelaar; N Malila; S Minozzi; S Moss; P Quirke; R J Steele; M Vieth; L Aabakken; L Altenhofen; R Ancelle-Park; N Antoljak; A Anttila; P Armaroli; S Arrossi; J Austoker; R Banzi; C Bellisario; J Blom; H Brenner; M Bretthauer; M Camargo Cancela; G Costamagna; J Cuzick; M Dai; J Daniel; E Dekker; N Delicata; S Ducarroz; H Erfkamp; J A Espinàs; J Faivre; L Faulds Wood; A Flugelman; S Frkovic-Grazio; B Geller; L Giordano; G Grazzini; J Green; C Hamashima; C Herrmann; P Hewitson; G Hoff; I Holten; R Jover; M F Kaminski; E J Kuipers; J Kurtinaitis; R Lambert; G Launoy; W Lee; R Leicester; M Leja; D Lieberman; T Lignini; E Lucas; E Lynge; S Mádai; J Marinho; J Maučec Zakotnik; G Minoli; C Monk; A Morais; R Muwonge; M Nadel; L Neamtiu; M Peris Tuser; M Pignone; C Pox; M Primic-Zakelj; J Psaila; L Rabeneck; D Ransohoff; M Rasmussen; J Regula; J Ren; G Rennert; J Rey; R H Riddell; M Risio; V Rodrigues; H Saito; C Sauvaget; A Scharpantgen; W Schmiegel; C Senore; M Siddiqi; D Sighoko; R Smith; S Smith; S Suchanek; E Suonio; W Tong; S Törnberg; E Van Cutsem; L Vignatelli; P Villain; L Voti; H Watanabe; J Watson; S Winawer; G Young; V Zaksas; M Zappa; R Valori
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Michael S Wolf; Austin Obichere; Rosalind Raine; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-20

Review 3.  Development of a comprehensive list of criteria for evaluating consumer education materials on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Maren Dreier; Birgit Borutta; Gabriele Seidel; Inga Kreusel; Jürgen Töppich; Eva M Bitzer; Marie-Luise Dierks; Ulla Walter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Communicating the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening needed for an informed choice: a systematic evaluation of leaflets and booklets.

Authors:  Maren Dreier; Birgit Borutta; Gabriele Seidel; Inga Münch; Silke Kramer; Jürgen Töppich; Marie-Luise Dierks; Ulla Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Rosalind Raine; Austin Obichere; Michael S Wolf; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-09-25

6.  Inequalities in cancer screening participation: examining differences in perceived benefits and barriers.

Authors:  S G Smith; L M McGregor; R Raine; J Wardle; C von Wagner; K A Robb
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study.

Authors:  Leonie Diedrich; Melanie Brinkmann; Maren Dreier; Wendelin Schramm; Christian Krauth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Patient-rated importance of key information on screening colonoscopy in Germany: a survey of statutory health insurance members.

Authors:  Maren Dreier; Kathrin Krueger; Ulla Walter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A large proportion of fecal immunochemical test-positive participants in colorectal cancer screening is symptomatic.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Manon van der Vlugt; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 4.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.