OBJECTIVES: Measuring urinary cotinine is a popular and established method of biologically monitoring exposure to tobacco smoke. However, the lower detection limit of cotinine often impedes the evaluation of passive (second-hand) smoking and this, together with unconverted nicotine, does not reflect actual levels of exposure. Furthermore, a portion of the Japanese population might have decreased ability to metabolize nicotine. The present study was therefore carried out to validate the simultaneous analysis of total concentrations of free nicotine and cotinine and their glucuronides to determine actual levels of voluntary and involuntary exposure to cigarette smoke. METHODS: Urine samples from 118 Japanese smokers and 117 non-smokers were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Voluntary and involuntary smoking status was self-reported and workplace smoking restrictions were objectively evaluated. RESULTS: The integrated sum of all concentrations showed 2.2- and 2.4-fold higher total levels (free and glucuronide) of nicotine and cotinine relative to the free levels. Median (quartiles) of total nicotine and cotinine were 1635 (2222) and 3948 (3512) ng/mL in smokers, and 3.5 (5.3) and 2.8 (4.2) ng/mL in non-smokers. Concentrations of urinary nicotine were higher than those of cotinine in 21 % of smokers and in 54 % of non-smokers. Nicotine and cotinine levels were significantly associated with a smoking habit, as well as being significantly associated with the workplace and home environments of non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The present method can monitor voluntary and involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke. Measuring total urinary nicotine levels might be useful for analyzing exposure to cigarette smoke among non-smokers.
OBJECTIVES: Measuring urinary cotinine is a popular and established method of biologically monitoring exposure to tobacco smoke. However, the lower detection limit of cotinine often impedes the evaluation of passive (second-hand) smoking and this, together with unconverted nicotine, does not reflect actual levels of exposure. Furthermore, a portion of the Japanese population might have decreased ability to metabolize nicotine. The present study was therefore carried out to validate the simultaneous analysis of total concentrations of free nicotine and cotinine and their glucuronides to determine actual levels of voluntary and involuntary exposure to cigarette smoke. METHODS: Urine samples from 118 Japanese smokers and 117 non-smokers were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Voluntary and involuntary smoking status was self-reported and workplace smoking restrictions were objectively evaluated. RESULTS: The integrated sum of all concentrations showed 2.2- and 2.4-fold higher total levels (free and glucuronide) of nicotine and cotinine relative to the free levels. Median (quartiles) of total nicotine and cotinine were 1635 (2222) and 3948 (3512) ng/mL in smokers, and 3.5 (5.3) and 2.8 (4.2) ng/mL in non-smokers. Concentrations of urinary nicotine were higher than those of cotinine in 21 % of smokers and in 54 % of non-smokers. Nicotine and cotinine levels were significantly associated with a smoking habit, as well as being significantly associated with the workplace and home environments of non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The present method can monitor voluntary and involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke. Measuring total urinary nicotine levels might be useful for analyzing exposure to cigarette smoke among non-smokers.
Authors: Rachel I Vogel; Steven G Carmella; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Che Nin Man; Ahmed Ibrahim Fathelrahman; Gam Lay Harn; Razak Lajis; Ahmad Shalihin Mohd Samin; Maizurah Omar; Rahmat Awang; Nurulain Abdullah Bayanuddin Journal: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Jian-Min Yuan; Yu-Tang Gao; Sharon E Murphy; Steven G Carmella; Renwei Wang; Yan Zhong; Kristin A Moy; Andrew B Davis; Li Tao; Menglan Chen; Shaomei Han; Heather H Nelson; Mimi C Yu; Stephen S Hecht Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nur Nadia Mohamed; See Ling Loy; Che Nin Man; Abdullah Al-Mamun; Hamid Jan Jan Mohamed Journal: Environ Health Prev Med Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Sònia Torres; Carla Merino; Beatrix Paton; Xavier Correig; Noelia Ramírez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.390