Literature DB >> 23011674

Importance of occlusal plane reproduction on the semi-adjustable articulator in planning maxillary impactions for orthognathic surgery.

Erica Cristina Marchiori1, Robson Rodrigues Garcia, Roger William Fernandes Moreira.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a 6° counterclockwise change in occlusal plane inclination would produce significant modifications on the final result of a maxillary impaction and mandible advancement model surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were used in this study, with ten identical maxillary casts and one mandibular cast mounted on the same semi-adjustable articulator, with the same malocclusion. The occlusal plane of the two control and study groups had an inclination of 13° and 7°, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative measures were performed using the Erickson platform and impactions of 6 and 10 mm were tested. To control these movements during model surgery, two splints were fabricated using another two maxillary and mandibular casts mounted with occlusal plane of 13°, simulating the proposed movement.
RESULTS: The results were compared using the t test. Only the antero-posterior movement of the upper incisor was statistically significant for both study groups (p < 0.05), with a mean of 0.48 and 0.94 mm in the 10 and 6 mm impaction groups, respectively. DISCUSSION: This information means that if an error in the occlusal plane transference occur, it will not be clinically significant, because differences smaller than 1 mm does not have influence on soft and hard tissue final result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23011674     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-012-0353-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  A M O'Malley; A Milosevic
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  J Gateno; K K Forrest; B Camp
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Accuracy of face-bow transfer: effect on surgical prediction and postsurgical result.

Authors:  E Ellis; W Tharanon; K Gambrell
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  A simple and accurate method for mounting models in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Larry M Wolford; Aluisio Galiano
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  A comparative study of two arbitrary face-bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning.

Authors:  M A Bamber; R Firouzal; M Harris; A Linney
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Comparison of cast positions by using four face-bows.

Authors:  J R Goska; L V Christensen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Evaluation of the third point of reference for mounting maxillary casts on the Hanau articulator.

Authors:  J O Bailey; T P Nowlin
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.426

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.