BACKGROUND: Measuring retention in HIV primary care is complex, as care includes multiple visits scheduled at varying intervals over time. We evaluated 6 commonly used retention measures in predicting viral load (VL) suppression and the correlation among measures. METHODS: Clinic-wide patient-level data from 6 academic HIV clinics were used for 12 months preceding implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Health Resources and Services Administration (CDC/HRSA) retention in care intervention. Six retention measures were calculated for each patient based on scheduled primary HIV provider visits: count and dichotomous missed visits, visit adherence, 6-month gap, 4-month visit constancy, and the HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau (HRSA HAB) retention measure. Spearman correlation coefficients and separate unadjusted logistic regression models compared retention measures with one another and with 12-month VL suppression, respectively. The discriminatory capacity of each measure was assessed with the c-statistic. RESULTS: Among 10,053 patients, 8235 (82%) had 12-month VL measures, with 6304 (77%) achieving suppression (VL <400 copies/mL). All 6 retention measures were significantly associated (P < 0.0001) with VL suppression (odds ratio; 95% CI, c-statistic): missed visit count (0.73; 0.71 to 0.75, 0.67), missed visit dichotomous (3.2; 2.8 to 3.6, 0.62), visit adherence (3.9; 3.5 to 4.3,0.69), gap (3.0; 2.6 to 3.3, 0.61), visit constancy (2.8; 2.5 to 3.0, 0.63), and HRSA HAB (3.8; 3.3 to 4.4, 0.59). Measures incorporating "no-show" visits were highly correlated (Spearman coefficient = 0.83-0.85), as were measures based solely on kept visits (Spearman coefficient = 0.72-0.77). Correlation coefficients were lower across these 2 groups of measures (range = 0.16-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Six retention measures displayed a wide range of correlation with one another, yet each measure had significant association and modest discrimination for VL suppression. These data suggest there is no clear gold standard and that selection of a retention measure may be tailored to context.
BACKGROUND: Measuring retention in HIV primary care is complex, as care includes multiple visits scheduled at varying intervals over time. We evaluated 6 commonly used retention measures in predicting viral load (VL) suppression and the correlation among measures. METHODS: Clinic-wide patient-level data from 6 academic HIV clinics were used for 12 months preceding implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Health Resources and Services Administration (CDC/HRSA) retention in care intervention. Six retention measures were calculated for each patient based on scheduled primary HIV provider visits: count and dichotomous missed visits, visit adherence, 6-month gap, 4-month visit constancy, and the HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau (HRSA HAB) retention measure. Spearman correlation coefficients and separate unadjusted logistic regression models compared retention measures with one another and with 12-month VL suppression, respectively. The discriminatory capacity of each measure was assessed with the c-statistic. RESULTS: Among 10,053 patients, 8235 (82%) had 12-month VL measures, with 6304 (77%) achieving suppression (VL <400 copies/mL). All 6 retention measures were significantly associated (P < 0.0001) with VL suppression (odds ratio; 95% CI, c-statistic): missed visit count (0.73; 0.71 to 0.75, 0.67), missed visit dichotomous (3.2; 2.8 to 3.6, 0.62), visit adherence (3.9; 3.5 to 4.3,0.69), gap (3.0; 2.6 to 3.3, 0.61), visit constancy (2.8; 2.5 to 3.0, 0.63), and HRSA HAB (3.8; 3.3 to 4.4, 0.59). Measures incorporating "no-show" visits were highly correlated (Spearman coefficient = 0.83-0.85), as were measures based solely on kept visits (Spearman coefficient = 0.72-0.77). Correlation coefficients were lower across these 2 groups of measures (range = 0.16-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Six retention measures displayed a wide range of correlation with one another, yet each measure had significant association and modest discrimination for VL suppression. These data suggest there is no clear gold standard and that selection of a retention measure may be tailored to context.
Authors: Thomas P Giordano; Fehmida Visnegarwala; A Clinton White; Catherine L Troisi; Ralph F Frankowski; Christine M Hartman; Richard M Grimes Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2005-08
Authors: Michael J Mugavero; Hui-Yi Lin; James H Willig; Andrew O Westfall; Kimberly B Ulett; Justin S Routman; Sarah Abroms; James L Raper; Michael S Saag; Jeroan J Allison Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Thomas P Giordano; Allen L Gifford; A Clinton White; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Linda Rabeneck; Christine Hartman; Lisa I Backus; Larry A Mole; Robert O Morgan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Moupali Das; Priscilla Lee Chu; Glenn-Milo Santos; Susan Scheer; Eric Vittinghoff; Willi McFarland; Grant N Colfax Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lisa R Metsch; Margaret Pereyra; Shari Messinger; Carlos Del Rio; Steffanie A Strathdee; Pamela Anderson-Mahoney; Ellen Rudy; Gary Marks; Lytt Gardner Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Judith A Aberg; Jonathan E Kaplan; Howard Libman; Patricia Emmanuel; Jean R Anderson; Valerie E Stone; James M Oleske; Judith S Currier; Joel E Gallant Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Anne Zinski; Andrew O Westfall; Lytt I Gardner; Thomas P Giordano; Tracey E Wilson; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Jeanne C Keruly; Allan E Rodriguez; Faye Malitz; D Scott Batey; Michael J Mugavero Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Robert A Bonacci; Katherine Frasca; Lyles Swift; Daohang Sha; Warren B Bilker; Laura Bamford; Baligh R Yehia; Robert Gross Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-05
Authors: Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Sonia Napravnik; Jay S Kaufman; Adaora A Adimora; Beth Elston; Joseph J Eron; Michael J Mugavero Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: David B Hanna; Nancy A Hessol; Elizabeth T Golub; Jennifer M Cocohoba; Mardge H Cohen; Alexandra M Levine; Tracey E Wilson; Mary Young; Kathryn Anastos; Robert C Kaplan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Michael J Mugavero; Andrew O Westfall; Stephen R Cole; Elvin H Geng; Heidi M Crane; Mari M Kitahata; W Christopher Mathews; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron; Richard D Moore; Jeanne C Keruly; Kenneth H Mayer; Thomas P Giordano; James L Raper Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: John A Sauceda; Nadra E Lisha; Samantha E Dilworth; Mallory O Johnson; Katerina A Christopoulos; Troy Wood; Kimberly A Koester; W Christopher Mathews; Richard D Moore; Sonia Napravnik; Kenneth H Mayer; Heidi M Crane; Rob J Fredericksen; Michael J Mugavero; Torsten B Neilands Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Chanelle J Howe; Sonia Napravnik; Stephen R Cole; Jay S Kaufman; Adaora A Adimora; Beth Elston; Joseph J Eron; Michael J Mugavero Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Keri N Althoff; Peter Rebeiro; John T Brooks; Kate Buchacz; Kelly Gebo; Jeffrey Martin; Robert Hogg; Jennifer E Thorne; Marina Klein; M John Gill; Timothy R Sterling; Baligh Yehia; Michael J Silverberg; Heidi Crane; Amy C Justice; Stephen J Gange; Richard Moore; Mari M Kitahata; Michael A Horberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 9.079