OBJECTIVES: Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) have the highest rates of HIV in the United States. Despite increased attention to social and sexual networks as a framework for biomedical intervention, the role of family in these networks and their relationship to HIV prevention have received limited attention. METHODS: A network sample (N = 380) of BMSM (n = 204) and their family members (n = 176) was generated through respondent-driven sampling of BMSM and elicitation of their personal networks. The proportion of personal network members who were family was calculated, and the weighted logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between this proportion and unprotected anal intercourse, sex-drug use (SDU), and group sex (GS), as well as intravention efforts to discourage these risk behaviors among their MSM social networks. RESULTS: 45.3% of respondents listed at least 1 family member in their close personal network. Greater family network proportion (having 2 or more family members in the close network) was associated with less SDU [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87] and participation in GS (AOR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.67). For intravention, BMSM with greater family proportion were more likely to discourage GS (AOR 3.83, 95% CI: 1.56 to 9.43) and SDU (AOR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.35 to 3.54) among their MSM friend network. Moreover, increased male family network proportion was associated with lower HIV risk and greater intravention than increased female network proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of BMSM have a close family member with whom they share personal information. Combination prevention interventions might be made more potent if this often overlooked component of personal networks was incorporated.
OBJECTIVES: Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) have the highest rates of HIV in the United States. Despite increased attention to social and sexual networks as a framework for biomedical intervention, the role of family in these networks and their relationship to HIV prevention have received limited attention. METHODS: A network sample (N = 380) of BMSM (n = 204) and their family members (n = 176) was generated through respondent-driven sampling of BMSM and elicitation of their personal networks. The proportion of personal network members who were family was calculated, and the weighted logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between this proportion and unprotected anal intercourse, sex-drug use (SDU), and group sex (GS), as well as intravention efforts to discourage these risk behaviors among their MSM social networks. RESULTS: 45.3% of respondents listed at least 1 family member in their close personal network. Greater family network proportion (having 2 or more family members in the close network) was associated with less SDU [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.87] and participation in GS (AOR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.67). For intravention, BMSM with greater family proportion were more likely to discourage GS (AOR 3.83, 95% CI: 1.56 to 9.43) and SDU (AOR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.35 to 3.54) among their MSM friend network. Moreover, increased male family network proportion was associated with lower HIV risk and greater intravention than increased female network proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of BMSM have a close family member with whom they share personal information. Combination prevention interventions might be made more potent if this often overlooked component of personal networks was incorporated.
Authors: Alida Bouris; Vincent Guilamo-Ramos; Angela Pickard; Chengshi Shiu; Penny S Loosier; Patricia Dittus; Kari Gloppen; J Michael Waldmiller Journal: J Prim Prev Date: 2010-12
Authors: Alexandra M Oster; Ryan E Wiegand; Catlainn Sionean; Isa J Miles; Peter E Thomas; Lehida Melendez-Morales; Binh C Le; Gregorio A Millett Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: John A Schneider; Benjamin Cornwell; David Ostrow; Stuart Michaels; Phil Schumm; Edward O Laumann; Samuel Friedman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Leo Wilton; Jeffrey H Herbst; Patricia Coury-Doniger; Thomas M Painter; Gary English; Maria E Alvarez; Maureen Scahill; Michael A Roberson; Basil Lucas; Wayne D Johnson; James W Carey Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-03-09
Authors: Nina T Harawa; Sander Greenland; Trista A Bingham; Denise F Johnson; Susan D Cochran; William E Cunningham; David D Celentano; Beryl A Koblin; Marlene LaLota; Duncan A MacKellar; William McFarland; Douglas Shehan; Sue Stoyanoff; Hanne Thiede; Lucia Torian; Lucia A Valleroy Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Britt Livak; Stuart Michaels; Keith Green; Charles Nelson; Montre Westbrook; Yaa Simpson; Nikhil G Prachand; Nanette Benbow; John A Schneider Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Enrique R Pouget; Milagros Sandoval; Diana Rossi; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Georgios K Nikolopoulos; John A Schneider; Pavlo Smyrnov; Ron D Stall Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-09
Authors: John A Schneider; Michael Kozloski; Stuart Michaels; Britt Skaathun; Dexter Voisin; Nicola Lancki; Ethan Morgan; Aditya Khanna; Keith Green; Robert W Coombs; Samuel R Friedman; Edward Laumann; Phil Schumm Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Yen-Tyng Chen; Dustin T Duncan; Rodal Issema; William C Goedel; Denton Callander; Benjamin Bernard-Herman; Hillary Hanson; Rebecca Eavou; John Schneider; Anna Hotton Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Hong-Van Tieu; Vijay Nandi; Donald R Hoover; Debbie Lucy; Kiwan Stewart; Victoria Frye; Magdalena Cerda; Danielle Ompad; Carl Latkin; Beryl A Koblin Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.078