Literature DB >> 23011018

[New S3 guidelines on exocrine pancreatic cancer].

A Tannapfel1.   

Abstract

In order to guarantee a unified application of the R classification, the S3 guidelines were amended. With the introduction of the so-called CRM concept the special situation of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head can be taken into account. In contrast to the R classification, in the CRM concept lymph node metastases, lymph vessel and perineural sheath infiltration are taken into consideration. The distance of the tumor from the resection margins is particularly documented. Because of the prognostic significance of tumor-free lymph nodes, in future the lymph node ratio should be given. This is defined as the relationship of lymph node metastases to the total number of lymph nodes removed/examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23011018     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-012-1638-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  11 in total

Review 1.  Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer--are we there yet?

Authors:  C S Verbeke
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP).

Authors:  Krishna V Menon; Dhanwant Gomez; Andrew M Smith; Alan Anthoney; Caroline S Verbeke
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nigel B Jamieson; Alan K Foulis; Karin A Oien; James J Going; Paul Glen; Euan J Dickson; Clem W Imrie; Colin J McKay; Ross Carter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome.

Authors:  Werner Hartwig; Thilo Hackert; Ulf Hinz; Alexander Gluth; Frank Bergmann; Oliver Strobel; Markus W Büchler; Jens Werner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Tumour growth is more dispersed in pancreatic head cancers than in rectal cancer: implications for resection margin assessment.

Authors:  Caroline Sophie Verbeke; Johannes Knapp; Ivar Prydz Gladhaug
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Can the new RCP R0/R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head?

Authors:  M S Janot; S Kersting; O Belyaev; A Matuschek; A M Chromik; D Suelberg; W Uhl; A Tannapfel; U Bergmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  A uniform residual tumor (R) classification: integration of the R classification and the circumferential margin status.

Authors:  Christian Wittekind; Carolyn Compton; Phil Quirke; Iris Nagtegaal; Susanne Merkel; Paul Hermanek; Leslie H Sobin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Margin clearance and outcome in resected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  David K Chang; Amber L Johns; Neil D Merrett; Anthony J Gill; Emily K Colvin; Christopher J Scarlett; Nam Q Nguyen; Rupert W L Leong; Peter H Cosman; Mark I Kelly; Robert L Sutherland; Susan M Henshall; James G Kench; Andrew V Biankin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin.

Authors:  Fiona Campbell; Richard A Smith; Philip Whelan; Robert Sutton; Michael Raraty; John P Neoptolemos; Paula Ghaneh
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  The mesopancreas is the primary site for R1 resection in pancreatic head cancer: relevance for clinical trials.

Authors:  J Gaedcke; B Gunawan; M Grade; R Szöke; T Liersch; H Becker; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.