Literature DB >> 23010950

Lipoprotein(a) plasma levels and the risk of cancer: the PRIME study.

Émilie Marrer1, Aline Wagner, Michèle Montaye, Gérald Luc, Philippe Amouyel, Jean Dallongeville, Pierre Ducimetiere, Annie Bingham, Dominique Arveiler, Michel Velten.   

Abstract

Although experimental studies have shown lipoprotein(a) antiangiogenic and antitumoral effects, the association of lipoprotein(a) levels with cancer in population studies remains elusive and poorly documented. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between lipoprotein(a) plasma levels and the incidence of cancer over 10 years of follow-up. Data from two French centres of the PRIME cohort were used, representing 5237 men aged 50-59 years and free from a history of cancer at baseline. Data on medical history, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors were obtained by questionnaire. Lipoprotein(a) plasma levels were analysed from fasting blood samples collected at baseline. The relationship between lipoprotein(a) levels and first incident cancer was studied using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for all-site and the main-site-specific cancers, adjusted for various potential confounders including age, centre, smoking status and alcohol consumption. During follow-up, 456 new cancers were identified. No significant association was found between lipoprotein(a) and the all-site or main-site-specific cancers (hazard ratios for quartiles 2-4 vs. 1, respectively: 1.24, 1.11, 1.29, P=0.23). However, a higher risk seemed to be observed for highest lipoprotein(a) levels in all sites, lung, colorectal or tobacco/alcohol-related cancers. For prostate cancer, the lowest risk was observed for the highest levels of lipoprotein(a) (P=0.12). In conclusion, no evident association was found between the lipoprotein(a) levels and the incidence of cancer. Nevertheless, a higher cancer risk seemed to be observed for the highest lipoprotein(a) levels. Further research focusing on the lipoprotein(a) qualitative structure, that is, apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism could help clarify this highly complex relation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23010950     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328359cba7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  5 in total

1.  Association of a methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism with several blood chemical levels in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Can Wen; Jiao-Feng Lv; Ling Wang; Wei-Feng Zhu; Fu-Sheng Wan; Xiao-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2015-01

2.  Blood lipids and lipoproteins in relation to incidence and mortality risks for CVD and cancer in the prospective EPIC-Heidelberg cohort.

Authors:  Verena Andrea Katzke; Disorn Sookthai; Theron Johnson; Tilman Kühn; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Low baseline plasma PCSK9 level is associated with good clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mengqing Xie; Xin Yu; Xiangling Chu; Huikang Xie; Juan Zhou; Jing Zhao; Chunxia Su
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Circulating levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and Lp(a) in stage III breast cancers.

Authors:  Emilie Wong Chong; France-Hélène Joncas; Nabil G Seidah; Frédéric Calon; Caroline Diorio; Anne Gangloff
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  High Lipoprotein(a) Level Is Independently Associated with Adverse Clinicopathological Features in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Fang-Ming Wang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.434

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.