| Literature DB >> 23010701 |
Abstract
I argue that the arguments brought by Counsel for M to the English Court of Protection are morally problematic in prioritising subjective interests that are the result of 'consistent autonomous thought' over subjective interests that are the result of a more limited cognitive perspective.Entities:
Keywords: Euthanasia
Mesh：
Year: 2012 PMID： 23010701 DOI： 10.1136/medethics-2012-100856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN： 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903