Literature DB >> 23010375

Predicting third molar surgery operative time: a validated model.

Srinivas M Susarla1, Thomas B Dodson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate a statistical model to predict third molar (M3) operative time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study consisting of a sample of subjects presenting for M3 removal. The demographic, anatomic, and operative variables were recorded for each subject. Using an index sample of randomly selected subjects, a multiple linear regression model was generated to predict the operating time. A nonoverlapping group of randomly selected subjects (validation sample) was used to assess model accuracy. P≤.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: The sample was composed of 150 subjects (n) who had 450 (k) M3s removed. The index sample (n=100 subjects, k=313 M3s extracted) had a mean age of 25.4±10.0 years. The mean extraction time was 6.4±7.0 minutes. The multiple linear regression model included M3 location, Winter's classification, tooth morphology, number of teeth extracted, procedure type, and surgical experience (R2=0.58). No statistically significant differences were seen between the index sample and the validation sample (n=50, k=137) for any of the study variables. Compared with the index model, the β-coefficients of the validation model were similar in direction and magnitude for most variables. Compared with the observed extraction time for all teeth in the sample, the predicted extraction time was not significantly different (P=.16).
CONCLUSIONS: Fair agreement was seen between the β-coefficients for our multiple models in the index and validation populations, with no significant difference in the predicted and observed operating times.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23010375     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Reasons why erupted third molars are extracted in a public university in Mexico.

Authors:  C E Medina-Solís; M Mendoza-Rodríguez; S Márquez-Rodríguez; R De la Rosa-Santillana; R Islas-Zarazua; J-D J Navarrete-Hernández; G Maupomé
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 0.171

2.  Influence of operator's professional experience in the postoperative course after surgical extrac-tion of the impacted lower third molar: A pilot study.

Authors:  Juan-Antonio Ruiz-Roca; Benjamin Donoso-Martínez; Susana Ameneiros-Serantes; Yolanda Martínez-Beneyto; Diego Salmerón-Martínez; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars?

Authors:  Kyeong-Lok Park
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Pre-Operative Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Attending Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar Teeth.

Authors:  Itzhak Abramovitz; Evgeny Zakopay; Avraham Zini; Harry Chweidan; Daniel Balakirski; Noam E Protter; Galit Almoznino
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16

5.  The wisdom behind the third molars removal: A prospective study of 106 cases.

Authors:  Kerdoud Ouassime; Aloua Rachid; Kaouani Amine; Belem Ousmane; Slimani Faiçal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.