Literature DB >> 23009956

Aging and visual crowding.

Charles T Scialfa1, Sheila Cordazzo, Katherine Bubric, John Lyon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The ability to perceive high spatial frequencies (i.e., fine detail) is impaired when contours are placed near the detail to be resolved (Bouma, H. [1970]. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178. doi:10.1038/226177a0; Flom, M. C., Weymouth, F. W., & Kahneman, D. [1963]. Visual resolution and contour interaction. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 53, 1026-1032. doi:10.1364/JOSA.53.001026.). This visual crowding is more pronounced outside of central vision and may be more pronounced in older adults. Thus, the motivation for the present study.
METHOD: Younger (M = 20.95 years) and older adults (M = 70.32 years) detected gap orientation in a Landolt C presented at 3° or 6° either alone or flanked by bars of the same spatial scale.
RESULTS: Both age groups demonstrated a visual crowding effect, in that acuity deteriorated in the flanking condition, an effect that grew with eccentricity. Older adults exhibited a larger crowding effect, particularly at 6°. Younger adults tested at reduced illumination did not show the crowding effect of older adults. Thus, age differences do not appear to result from reduced retinal illumination. When the crowding effect was operationalized as the ratio of crowded to uncrowded acuity, age differences were eliminated at both 3° and 6°. DISCUSSION: These data have implications for understanding age differences in functional vision, including reading and visual search.

Keywords:  Age differences; Peripheral acuity.; Visual acuity; Visual crowding

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009956     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbs086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  17 in total

1.  The "risky" reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z Reader.

Authors:  Victoria A McGowan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Is 20/20 vision good enough? Visual acuity differences within the normal range predict contour element detection and integration.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Sabine Kastner; Danielle Paterno; Steven M Silverstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

3.  Improving Wayfinding for Older Users With Selective Attention Deficits.

Authors:  Ada D Mishler; Mark B Neider
Journal:  Ergon Des       Date:  2016-11-15

4.  Measuring age differences in executive control using rapid motor decisions in a robotic object hit and avoid task.

Authors:  Alexandra T Watral; Kevin M Trewartha
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-09-09

5.  A BOLD Perspective on Age-Related Neurometabolic-Flow Coupling and Neural Efficiency Changes in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Joanna Lynn Hutchison; Ehsan Shokri-Kojori; Hanzhang Lu; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-03

6.  Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

7.  Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The effect of aging on crowded letter recognition in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Andrew T Astle; Alan J Blighe; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Detecting Visual Function Abnormality with a Contrast-Dependent Visual Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Li-Ting Tsai; Kuo-Meng Liao; Yuh Jang; Fu-Chang Hu; Wei-Chi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Useful field of view test performance throughout adulthood in subjects without ocular disorders.

Authors:  Karlijn Woutersen; Albert V van den Berg; F Nienke Boonstra; Thomas Theelen; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.