Literature DB >> 23009868

Frequency of the male infertility evaluation: data from the national survey of family growth.

Michael L Eisenberg1, Ruth B Lathi, Valerie L Baker, Lynn M Westphal, Amin A Milki, Ajay K Nangia.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An estimated 7 million American couples per year seek infertility care in the United States. A male factor contributes to 50% of cases but it is unclear what proportion of infertile couples undergoes male evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from cycles 5 to 7 of the National Survey of Family Growth performed by the Centers for Disease Control to determine the frequency of a male infertility evaluation, and associated reproductive and demographic factors.
RESULTS: A total of 25,846 women and 11,067 men were surveyed. Male evaluation was not completed in 18% of couples when the male partner was asked vs 27% when female partners were asked. This corresponds to approximately 370,000 to 860,000 men in the population who were not evaluated at the time of infertility evaluation. Longer infertility duration and white race were associated with increased odds of male infertility evaluation. The male and female samples showed no change in the receipt of male examination with time.
CONCLUSIONS: Many men from infertile couples do not undergo male evaluation in the United States. Given the potential implications to reproductive goals and male health, further examination of this pattern is warranted.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009868     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

Review 1.  Use of Ultrasound in Male Infertility: Appropriate Selection of Men for Scrotal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Joseph M Armstrong; Sorena Keihani; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Antioxidants for male subfertility.

Authors:  Wiep de Ligny; Roos M Smits; Rebecca Mackenzie-Proctor; Vanessa Jordan; Kathrin Fleischer; Jan Peter de Bruin; Marian G Showell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 3.  Gaps in male infertility health services research.

Authors:  Andrew K Leung; Mark A Henry; Akanksha Mehta
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

Review 4.  Limitations and opportunities in male fertility databases.

Authors:  Brent M Hanson; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

Review 5.  Insurance coverage of male infertility: what should the standard be?

Authors:  James M Dupree
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

6.  Awareness of and attitudes towards infertility and its treatment: a cross-sectional survey of men in a United States primary care population.

Authors:  Robert S Gerhard; Chad W M Ritenour; Michael Goodman; Dipak Vashi; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Advancement of male health is dependent upon updates to insurance coverage for infertility in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan P Smith; Larry I Lipshultz; Jason R Kovac
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Insurance coverage for male infertility care in the United States.

Authors:  James M Dupree
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Can men be trusted in population-based surveys to report couples' medical care for infertility?

Authors:  Soraya Belgherbi; Elise de La Rochebrochard
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Online access to male factor infertility care: the challenge of finding a specialist.

Authors:  Arighno Das; Anne Darves-Bornoz; Tejas Joshi; Mary Kate Keeter; James M Wren; Nelson E Bennett; Robert E Brannigan; Joshua A Halpern
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.