Literature DB >> 23009727

Metabolic imaging metrics correlate with survival in early stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Jonathan A Abelson1, James D Murphy, Nicholas Trakul, Jose G Bazan, Peter G Maxim, Edward E Graves, Andrew Quon, Quynh-Thu Le, Maximilian Diehn, Billy W Loo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To test whether (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging metrics correlate with outcomes in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with stage I NSCLC underwent pre-SABR PET at simulation and/or post-SABR PET within 6 months. We analyzed maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and metabolic tumor volume defined using several thresholds (MTV50%, or MTV2, 4, 7, and 10). Endpoints included primary tumor control (PTC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We performed Kaplan-Meier, competing risk, and Cox proportional hazards survival analyses.
RESULTS: Patients received 25-60 Gy in 1 to 5 fractions. Median follow-up time was 13.2 months. The 1-year estimated PTC, PFS, OS and CSS were 100, 83, 87 and 94%, respectively. Pre-treatment SUV(max) (p=0.014), MTV(7) (p=0.0077), and MTV(10) (p=0.0039) correlated significantly with OS. In the low-MTV(7)vs. high-MTV(7) sub-groups, 1-year estimated OS was 100 vs. 78% (p=0.0077) and CSS was 100 vs. 88% (p=0.082).
CONCLUSIONS: In this hypothesis-generating study we identified multiple pre-treatment PET-CT metrics as potential predictors of OS and CSS in patients with NSCLC treated with SABR. These could aid risk-stratification and treatment individualization if validated prospectively.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009727     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  22 in total

1.  Risk-stratifying capacity of PET/CT metabolic tumor volume in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joshua H Finkle; Stephanie Y Jo; Mark K Ferguson; Hai-Yan Liu; Chenpeng Zhang; Xuee Zhu; Cindy Yuan; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Developing and validating a novel metabolic tumor volume risk stratification system for supplementing non-small cell lung cancer staging.

Authors:  Yonglin Pu; James X Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Daniel Appelbaum; Jianfeng Meng; Bill C Penney
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Tyler Bradshaw; Meiyappan Solaiyappan; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-19

4.  Metabolic tumour volume is prognostic in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Dosani; R Yang; M McLay; D Wilson; M Liu; C J Yong-Hing; J Hamm; C R Lund; R Olson; D Schellenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  A systematic review of outcomes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Murray; Kevin Franks; Gerard G Hanna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  FDG-PET maximum standardized uptake value is prognostic for recurrence and survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zachary A Kohutek; Abraham J Wu; Zhigang Zhang; Amanda Foster; Shaun U Din; Ellen D Yorke; Robert Downey; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Wolfgang A Weber; Andreas Rimner
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Prognostic value of metabolic metrics extracted from baseline positron emission tomography images in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sara Carvalho; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Cary Oberije; Chintan Parmar; Wouter van Elmpt; Bart Reymen; Esther G C Troost; Michel Oellers; Andre Dekker; Robert Gillies; Hugo J W L Aerts; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Estimated by (18) F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of Stage II or III Disease.

Authors:  Jihyun Kim; Junshik Hong; Seog Gyun Kim; Kyung Hoon Hwang; Minsu Kim; Hee Kyung Ahn; Sun Jin Sym; Jinny Park; Eun Kyung Cho; Dong Bok Shin; Jae Hoon Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-29

9.  Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of (18)F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Kyoungjune Pak; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Seong-Jang Kim; In-Joo Kim; June-Key Chung; E Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Quantitative Imaging Characteristics of (18)F Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Allow Prediction of Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Todd Aguilera; David Shultz; Madhu Gudur; Daniel L Rubin; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.