Literature DB >> 23009228

Secluded and restrained patients' perceptions of their treatment.

Päivi Soininen1, Maritta Välimäki, Toshie Noda, Pauli Puukka, Jyrki Korkeila, Grigori Joffe, Hanna Putkonen.   

Abstract

Though some empirical and anecdotal accounts can be located in the extant literature, it remains the case that little is known about how secluded/restrained (S/R) patients perceive their overall treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore patients' perceptions of their hospital treatment measured after S/R. The data were collected with a Secluded and Restrained Patients' Perceptions of their Treatment (S/R-PPT) questionnaire from S/R patients aged 18-65 years. Ninety completed questionnaires were analysed. Patients perceived that they received enough attention from staff, and they were able to voice their opinions, but their opinions were not taken into account. Patients denied the necessity and beneficence of S/R. Women and older patients were more critical than men and younger patients regarding the use of restrictions. There were also statistically-significant differences in responses among patients at different hospitals. It is concluded that patients' opinions need more attention in treatment decisions. To achieve this, psychiatric treatment needs genuine dialogue between patients and staff, and individual care should have alternatives and no routine decisions. Therefore, the treatment culture must improve towards involving patients in treatment planning, and giving them a say when S/R is considered.
© 2012 The Authors; International Journal of Mental Health Nursing © 2012 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009228     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00838.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  10 in total

1.  Being in a process of transition to psychosis, as narrated by adults with psychotic illnesses acutely admitted to hospital.

Authors:  K Sebergsen; A Norberg; A-G Talseth
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.952

2.  Use of Coercive Measures during Involuntary Psychiatric Admission and Treatment Outcomes: Data from a Prospective Study across 10 European Countries.

Authors:  Paul McLaughlin; Domenico Giacco; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparing Attitudes to Containment Measures of Patients, Health Care Professionals and Next of Kin.

Authors:  Thomas Reisch; Simone Beeri; Georges Klein; Philipp Meier; Philippe Pfeifer; Etienne Buehler; Florian Hotzy; Matthias Jaeger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Samia Hurst; Stefan Kaiser; Othman Sentissi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  A "Necessary Evil": Staff Perspectives of Soft Restraint Kit Use in a High-Security Hospital.

Authors:  Helen Walker; Lindsay Tulloch
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Patients' Experiences of Participating Actively in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Care.

Authors:  Lise Sæstad Beyene; Elisabeth Severinsson; Britt Sætre Hansen; Kristine Rørtveit
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 7.  Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients' perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Psychiatric staff on the wards does not share attitudes on aggression.

Authors:  Tero Laiho; Nina Lindberg; Grigori Joffe; Hanna Putkonen; Anja Hottinen; Raija Kontio; Eila Sailas
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2014-04-22

9.  Does experienced seclusion or restraint affect psychiatric patients' subjective quality of life at discharge?

Authors:  Päivi Soininen; Hanna Putkonen; Grigori Joffe; Jyrki Korkeila; Pauli Puukka; Anneli Pitkänen; Maritta Välimäki
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2013-12-05

10.  Effect of standardized post-coercion review on subjective coercion: Results of a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  A Wullschleger; A Vandamme; J Mielau; L Stoll; A Heinz; F Bermpohl; A Bechdolf; M Stelzig; O Hardt; I Hauth; V Holthoff-Detto; L Mahler; C Montag
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.361

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.