| Literature DB >> 23008814 |
Arun K Mishra1, Amrita Mishra, Anurag Verma, Pronobesh Chattopadhyay.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from UV-B radiation have the capacity to cause oxidative decomposition which leads to the formation of toxic components as well as lipid peroxidation. Considering this fact, the present study was performed to evaluate the effect of a cream (O/W) containing the essential oil of Calendula officinalis on biochemical parameters of the skin of albino rats against UV-B radiation. The fingerprint analysis of Calendula essential oil was performed by HPLC with special reference to 1,8-cineole and α-pinene. The results indicated that the treatment with creams containing 4% and 5% of Calendula essential oil caused a significant decrease in the malonyldialdehyde level, whereas the levels of catalase, glutathione, superoxide dismutase, ascorbic acid, and the total protein level were significantly increased after 1 month of daily irradiation and treatment when compared to untreated control groups. The results suggest that the cutaneous application of the essential oil of Calendula prevents UV-B-induced alterations in the level of antioxidants in skin tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical parameters; Calendula essential oil; Lipid peroxidation; UV-B radiation
Year: 2012 PMID: 23008814 PMCID: PMC3447623 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1112-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Fig. 1Chromatogram of 1,8-cineole and α-pinene as standard
Fig. 2Chromatogram of calendula oil with peaks of 1,8-cineole and α-pinene
Concentration of 1,8-cineole and α-pinene in Calendula essential oil by HPLC method
| Compound | Concentration (%w/w) |
|---|---|
| 1,8-cineole | 8.12±0.7 |
| α-pinene | 22.53±0.2 |
HPLC method validation parameters for quantization of 1,8-cineole and α-pinene in Calendula officinalis L. essential oil
| Parameters | Result | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 1,8-cineole | α-pinene | |
| Concentration range (μg/ml) | 10–100 | 10–100 |
| Linearity (r2) | 0.9989 | 0.9957 |
| LOD and LOQ | 1.8 and 5.5 | 8.5 and 25.5 |
| Intra-day precission (50 and 60) (n=3, %RSD) | 1.2 and 0.8 | 1.5 and 1.6 |
| Intra-day precission (50 and 60) (n=3, %RSD) | 1.4 and 1.2 | 1.3 and 1.9 |
Recovery studies of 1,8-cineole and α-pinene from formulations
| F4 | F5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1,8-cineole | α-pinene | 1,8-cineole | α-pinene | |
| Mean Recovery (%)±SEM(n=3) | 97.5±0.23 | 97.2±0.62 | 96.2±0.44 | 95.8±0.84 |
Effect of UV-B radiation and the formulations on MDA, SOD and CAT levels in rat skin
| Groups | Treatments | MDA content (nmoles/mg±SEM) | SOD (IU/mg±SEM) | CAT (μmole/min/mg±SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gr I | Control | 1.13±0.288 | 6.32±0.54 | 45.12±0.24 |
| Gr II | UV-B Irradiated | 1.85±0.421 | 1.32±0.41 | 20.15±0.45 |
| Gr III | UV-B + F4 treated | 1.26±0.211 | 6.52±0.52 | 35.62±0.15 |
| Gr IV | UV-B + F5 treated | 1.18±0.144 | 7.11±0.39 | 39.99±0.25 |
Significantly different control group I(p<0.01);
Significantlly different from group II(p<0.05).
The values are presented as Mean±SEM; each group consisted of 6 albino rats.
Effect of UV-B radiation and the formulations on GSH, ASC and TP levels in rat skin
| Groups | Treatments | GSH level (nmoles/min/mg) | ASC (mg/100mL±SEM) | TP (μg/mL ±SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gr I | Control | 35.43±0.28 | 8.11±0.57 | 626±0. 443 |
| Gr II | UV-B Irradiated | 18.25±0. 21 | 3.19±0.35 | 465±0.345 |
| Gr III | UV-B + F4 treated | 26.45±0.51 | 7. 21±0.15 | 592±0.412 |
| Gr IV | UV-B + F5 treated | 33.65±0. 44 | 7.85±0.10 | 630±0.24, |
Significantly different control group I(p<0.01);
Significantlly different from group II(p<0.05).
The values are presented as Mean±SEM; each group consisted of 6 albino rats.
Animal grouping
| Groups (n=6) | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Gr I | Without UV-B Irradiation and without cream treatment |
| Gr II | UV-B irradiated |
| Gr III | UV-B +F4 treated |
| Gr IV | UV-B +F5 treated |