Literature DB >> 23007488

Flexion-rotation trunk test to assess abdominal muscle endurance: reliability, learning effect, and sex differences.

Evaristo Brotons-Gil1, Maria P García-Vaquero, Noelia Peco-González, Francisco J Vera-Garcia.   

Abstract

Trunk endurance tests are generally performed in sagittal or frontal plane. However, trunk field tests that measure the endurance of the rotator muscles are lacking. In view of this situation, we developed a flexion-rotation trunk test (FRT test) to assess the oblique abdominal muscle endurance. This new field test consists mainly in performing the maximum number of upper trunk flexion and rotation movements (reps) possible in 90 seconds. The objectives of this study were to analyze the FRT test reliability and to examine the effect of both the repetition and sex on test results. Fifty-one recreationally trained men (n = 35) and women (n = 16) completed 4 trials of the FRT test (T1, T2, T3, and T4), separated by 7 days each. The scores increased significantly between T1 and T3 (p < 0.001), showing a clear learning effect, but the increase between T3 and T4 was only 4.25% (p = 0.108). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between trials were ≥0.83 and the standard errors of measurement (SEMs) ≤7.54 reps. The ICCs between trials increased, and SEMs decreased with test repetition, reaching an ICC of 0.94 and an SEM of 6.46 reps between T3 and T4. The comparison between sexes showed a higher abdominal endurance in men when compared with that in women (p = 0.003), and also a higher learning effect in men, especially at the beginning of the study. These findings suggest that, the FRT test is a reliable field protocol that differentiates between the abdominal endurance of men and women. However, it is necessary to perform an extensive familiarization period before testing (at least 3 trials of practice) to make learning effect negligible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23007488     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827124d9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Reliability of Field-Based Fitness Tests in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Magdalena Cuenca-Garcia; Nuria Marin-Jimenez; Alejandro Perez-Bey; David Sánchez-Oliva; Daniel Camiletti-Moiron; Inmaculada C Alvarez-Gallardo; Francisco B Ortega; Jose Castro-Piñero
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Trunk Strength Characteristics of Elite Alpine Skiers - a Comparison with Physically Active Controls.

Authors:  Carolin Hildebrandt; Lisa Müller; Christian Heisse; Christian Raschner
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Efficacy of School-Based Interventions for Improving Muscular Fitness Outcomes in Adolescent Boys: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Stuart J Fairclough; Maria-Christina Kosteli; Robert J Noonan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Isometric Strength Database for Muscle Maximal Voluntary Endurance Field Tests: Normative Data.

Authors:  Frédérick Janik; Claire Toulotte; Anne Laure Seichepine; Bernadette Masquelier; Fabienne Barbier; Claudine Fabre
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.