PURPOSE: This phase I study assessed the toxicity and safety of combining daily lapatinib with radiation therapy. Sequential tumor biopsies were obtained to evaluate changes in biomarkers, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human EGFR-2 (HER2) signaling pathways. METHODS: Eligibility for this dose-escalation study included unresectable and locally recurrent or chemotherapy-refractory and locally advanced breast cancer, and adequate organ function. Patients underwent three serial biopsies: at baseline, after 1 week of lapatinib alone, and after 1 week of lapatinib and radiation. Endpoints included determination of toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and analysis of the effect of lapatinib with or without radiation on EGFR and HER2 signaling pathways by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Doses of lapatinib up to 1,500 mg/day were well tolerated. Toxicity of grade 3 or more was limited to radiation dermatitis and pain. Out of 19 patients treated, in field responses per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria were complete in four patients and partial in six patients. Serial biopsies were obtained in 16 patients with no complications. Total Her2 was relatively unchanged while phospho-Her2, phospho-Akt, and phospho-ERK showed variable responses to both lapatinib alone and dual therapy with lapatinib and radiation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lapatinib and radiation was well tolerated in this patient cohort. Overall local response rates were comparable to those reported in other studies in this patient population. Biopsies were safely performed at all time points. Inhibition of HER2 and downstream signaling pathways was identified, although no strong correlation with response was seen.
PURPOSE: This phase I study assessed the toxicity and safety of combining daily lapatinib with radiation therapy. Sequential tumor biopsies were obtained to evaluate changes in biomarkers, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and humanEGFR-2 (HER2) signaling pathways. METHODS: Eligibility for this dose-escalation study included unresectable and locally recurrent or chemotherapy-refractory and locally advanced breast cancer, and adequate organ function. Patients underwent three serial biopsies: at baseline, after 1 week of lapatinib alone, and after 1 week of lapatinib and radiation. Endpoints included determination of toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and analysis of the effect of lapatinib with or without radiation on EGFR and HER2 signaling pathways by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Doses of lapatinib up to 1,500 mg/day were well tolerated. Toxicity of grade 3 or more was limited to radiation dermatitis and pain. Out of 19 patients treated, in field responses per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria were complete in four patients and partial in six patients. Serial biopsies were obtained in 16 patients with no complications. Total Her2 was relatively unchanged while phospho-Her2, phospho-Akt, and phospho-ERK showed variable responses to both lapatinib alone and dual therapy with lapatinib and radiation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lapatinib and radiation was well tolerated in this patient cohort. Overall local response rates were comparable to those reported in other studies in this patient population. Biopsies were safely performed at all time points. Inhibition of HER2 and downstream signaling pathways was identified, although no strong correlation with response was seen.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eugene Huang; Marsha D McNeese; Eric A Strom; George H Perkins; Angela Katz; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Vicente Valero; Henry M Kuerer; S Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Aman U Buzdar; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Janet K Horton; Jan Halle; Madlyn Ferraro; Lisa Carey; Dominic T Moore; David Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-06-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K J Halverson; C A Perez; R R Kuske; D M Garcia; J R Simpson; B Fineberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1990-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L Kosma; M Koukourakis; J Skarlatos; C Zambatis; A Ardavanis; K Beroukas; D Yannakakis Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John P Crown; Harold A Burris; Fran Boyle; Suzanne Jones; Maria Koehler; Beth O Newstat; Roma Parikh; Cristina Oliva; Alaknanda Preston; Julie Byrne; Steve Chan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-01-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M E Lacouture; S M Laabs; M Koehler; R W Sweetman; A J Preston; A Di Leo; H L Gomez; V M Salazar; J A Byrne; K M Koch; K L Blackwell Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-07-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Andrew P Stein; Adam D Swick; Molly A Smith; Grace C Blitzer; Robert Z Yang; Sandeep Saha; Paul M Harari; Paul F Lambert; Cheng Z Liu; Randall J Kimple Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 4.452