OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effects of a protocol aiming to reduce hypotension in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients submitted to sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to two SLED prescriptions-control group, dialysate temperature was 37.0°C with a fixed sodium concentration [138 mEq/L] and ultrafiltration (UF) rate; and profiling group, dialysate temperature was 35.5°C with a variable sodium concentration [150-138 mEq/L] and UF rate. RESULTS: Sixty-two SLED sessions were evaluated (34 in profiling and 28 in control). Patients (n = 31) were similar in terms of gender, age, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Dialysis time, dialysis dose, and post-dialysis serum sodium were similar in both groups. The profiling group had significantly less hypotension episodes (23% vs. 57% in control, p = 0.009) and achieved higher UF volume (2.23 ± 1.25 L vs. 1.59 ± 1.03 L in control, p = 0.04) when compared with control group. CONCLUSIONS:SLED protocol with modulation of dialysate temperature, sodium, and UF profiling showed similar efficacy but less intradialytic hypotension when compared with a standard SLED prescription.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effects of a protocol aiming to reduce hypotension in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients submitted to sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). METHODS:Patients were randomly assigned to two SLED prescriptions-control group, dialysate temperature was 37.0°C with a fixed sodium concentration [138 mEq/L] and ultrafiltration (UF) rate; and profiling group, dialysate temperature was 35.5°C with a variable sodium concentration [150-138 mEq/L] and UF rate. RESULTS: Sixty-two SLED sessions were evaluated (34 in profiling and 28 in control). Patients (n = 31) were similar in terms of gender, age, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Dialysis time, dialysis dose, and post-dialysis serum sodium were similar in both groups. The profiling group had significantly less hypotension episodes (23% vs. 57% in control, p = 0.009) and achieved higher UF volume (2.23 ± 1.25 L vs. 1.59 ± 1.03 L in control, p = 0.04) when compared with control group. CONCLUSIONS: SLED protocol with modulation of dialysate temperature, sodium, and UF profiling showed similar efficacy but less intradialytic hypotension when compared with a standard SLED prescription.
Authors: Kanwalpreet Sodhi; Atul Phillips; Rajesh C Mishra; Niraj Tyagi; Subhal B Dixit; Dhruva Chaudhary; Manender K Singla; Prakash C Kowdle; Poonam M Kapoor Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Date: 2020-09
Authors: Katherine E Lynch; Fatimah Ghassemi; Jennifer E Flythe; Mengling Feng; Marzyeh Ghassemi; Leo Anthony Celi; Steven M Brunelli Journal: Nephrology (Carlton) Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Scott McGuire; Elizabeth Jane Horton; Derek Renshaw; Alofonso Jimenez; Nithya Krishnan; Gordon McGregor Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Adrianna Douvris; Gurpreet Malhi; Swapnil Hiremath; Lauralyn McIntyre; Samuel A Silver; Sean M Bagshaw; Ron Wald; Claudio Ronco; Lindsey Sikora; Catherine Weber; Edward G Clark Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Adrianna Douvris; Khalid Zeid; Swapnil Hiremath; Sean M Bagshaw; Ron Wald; William Beaubien-Souligny; Jennifer Kong; Claudio Ronco; Edward G Clark Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 17.440