Literature DB >> 2300540

Effects of variation in drug elimination on five methods for assessing zero-order drug absorption rates.

H Y Cheng1, W J Jusko.   

Abstract

The area function method for assessing zero-order (ko) drug absorption rates was compared to four other methods under conditions where variation occurs in the plasma concentration data and in the elimination rate constant (kel or k10) for one- or two-compartment models. For deviant kel values of a one-compartment model, the most accurate recovery of ko occurred with the area function method and nonlinear least-squares regression, followed by the Wagner-Nelson and moment analysis methods. With deviant k10 values for a two-compartment model, the order of superiority of the methods was: area function approximately nonlinear regression greater than Loo-Riegelman greater than moment analysis. Moment analysis should generally be reserved for use as an estimation rather than calculation technique. The area function procedure offers particular advantages in ease of data analysis and accuracy of recovered parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2300540     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015843811150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  6 in total

1.  The area function method for assessing the drug absorption rate in linear systems with zero-order input.

Authors:  H Cheng; W J Jusko
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  An area function method for estimating the apparent absorption rate constant.

Authors:  H Cheng; A E Staubus; L Shum
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Estimation of theophylline absorption rate by means of the Wagner-Nelson equation.

Authors:  J G Wagner
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Effect of using an incorrect elimination rate constant in application of the Wagner-Nelson method to theophylline data in cases of zero order absorption.

Authors:  J G Wagner
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1984 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.627

5.  Evaluating drug absorption after oral administration. Some problems and some solutions.

Authors:  K K Chan; M Gibaldi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Evaluation of drug absorption by nonlinear regression, statistical moments, and Loo-Riegelman methods.

Authors:  I H Patel; L Bornemann; W A Colburn
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.534

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.