Literature DB >> 23005264

Bivariate marker measurements and ROC analysis.

Mei-Cheng Wang1, Shanshan Li.   

Abstract

This article considers receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for bivariate marker measurements. The research interest is to extend tools and rules from univariate marker to bivariate marker setting for evaluating predictive accuracy of markers using a tree-based classification rule. Using an and-or classifier, an ROC function together with a weighted ROC function (WROC) and their conjugate counterparts are proposed for examining the performance of bivariate markers. The proposed functions evaluate the performance of and-or classifiers among all possible combinations of marker values, and are ideal measures for understanding the predictability of biomarkers in target population. Specific features of ROC and WROC functions and other related statistics are discussed in comparison with those familiar properties for univariate marker. Nonparametric methods are developed for estimating ROC-related functions (partial) area under curve and concordance probability. With emphasis on average performance of markers, the proposed procedures and inferential results are useful for evaluating marker predictability based on a single or bivariate marker (or test) measurements with different choices of markers, and for evaluating different and-or combinations in classifiers. The inferential results developed in this article also extend to multivariate markers with a sequence of arbitrarily combined and-or classifier.
© 2012, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23005264      PMCID: PMC3530667          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01783.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  20 in total

1.  Partial AUC estimation and regression.

Authors:  Lori E Dodd; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; C B Begg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Incorporating the time dimension in receiver operating characteristic curves: a case study of prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Etzioni; M Pepe; G Longton; C Hu; G Goodman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Identifying combinations of cancer markers for further study as triggers of early intervention.

Authors:  S G Baker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Statistical models for longitudinal biomarkers of disease onset.

Authors:  E H Slate; B W Turnbull
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Baseline MRI predictors of conversion from MCI to probable AD in the ADNI cohort.

Authors:  Shannon L Risacher; Andrew J Saykin; John D West; Li Shen; Hiram A Firpi; Brenna C McDonald
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Nancy R Cook; Andrew Vickers; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Simple and flexible classification of gene expression microarrays via Swirls and Ripples.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  ROC analysis for multiple markers with tree-based classification.

Authors:  Mei-Cheng Wang; Shanshan Li
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Obtaining optimal cutoff values for tree classifiers using multiple biomarkers.

Authors:  Yuxin Zhu; Mei-Cheng Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 1.701

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.