Literature DB >> 23003235

Comparison of atom interferometers and light interferometers as space-based gravitational wave detectors.

John G Baker1, J I Thorpe.   

Abstract

We consider a class of proposed gravitational-wave detectors based on multiple atomic interferometers separated by large baselines and referenced by common laser systems. We compute the sensitivity limits of these detectors due to intrinsic phase noise of the light sources, noninertial motion of the light sources, and atomic shot noise and compare them to sensitivity limits for traditional light interferometers. We find that atom interferometers and light interferometers are limited in a nearly identical way by intrinsic phase noise and that both require similar mitigation strategies (e.g., multiple-arm instruments) to reach interesting sensitivities. The sensitivity limit from motion of the light sources is slightly different and, in principle, favors the atom interferometers in the low-frequency limit, although the limit in both cases is severe.

Year:  2012        PMID: 23003235     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.211101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  3 in total

Review 1.  Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors.

Authors:  Jonathan R Gair; Michele Vallisneri; Shane L Larson; John G Baker
Journal:  Living Rev Relativ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 40.429

Review 2.  Terrestrial Gravity Fluctuations.

Authors:  Jan Harms
Journal:  Living Rev Relativ       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 40.429

3.  Gravitational Wave-Signal Recognition Model Based on Fourier Transform and Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Zhijun Zhu; Minglei Fu; Minchao Hu; Kezhen Rong; Dmytro Lande; Dmytro Manko; Zaher Mundher Yaseen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.