Literature DB >> 23002921

Older adults have greater difficulty imagining future rather than atemporal experiences.

Peter G Rendell1, Phoebe E Bailey, Julie D Henry, Louise H Phillips, Shae Gaskin, Matthias Kliegel.   

Abstract

Episodic future thinking refers to mentally traveling forward in time to preexperience an event, and emerging research suggests that this is more difficult for older adults. The current study was designed to better understand the effect of aging on separate component processes of age differences in episodic future thinking. Young (n = 24) and older (n = 25) adults were asked to construct a) atemporal scenarios, b) future scenarios, and c) a narrative that involved navigation. Each of these conditions assesses the capacity to construct and describe a scene, but only the future scenario requires a subjective sense of self in time (autonoetic consciousness). The composite measure of performance showed that relative to young adults, older adults have substantially reduced capacity for all three types of construction, suggesting that age-related difficulty imagining future episodic events may reflect a more general cognitive decline with age. In addition, older adults were worse at imagining future experiences than atemporal experiences, indicating limited capacity for autonoetic consciousness. Further, this difference between imagining atemporal and future experiences was not as evident among younger adults. These deficits in episodic future thinking have implications for the daily lives of older adults in terms of anticipating and planning for the future. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23002921     DOI: 10.1037/a0029748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  19 in total

1.  An episodic specificity induction enhances means-end problem solving in young and older adults.

Authors:  Kevin P Madore; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 2.  A taxonomy of prospection: introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar; R Nathan Spreng; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of aging on the relation between episodic simulation and prosocial intentions.

Authors:  Brendan Gaesser; Haley Dodds; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Taking the Biggest First: Age Differences in Preferences for Monetary and Hedonic Sequences.

Authors:  JoNell Strough; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Not to worry: Episodic retrieval impacts emotion regulation in older adults.

Authors:  Helen G Jing; Kevin P Madore; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-02-28

6.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: Selective effects of an episodic specificity induction on detail generation.

Authors:  Kevin P Madore; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: Identifying and enhancing the contribution of episodic memory.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Kevin P Madore
Journal:  Mem Stud       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  Beliefs about savoring in older adulthood: Aging and perceived health affect temporal components of perceived savoring ability.

Authors:  Paul J Geiger; Jennifer N Morey; Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2016-10-01

9.  Episodic and semantic content of memory and imagination: A multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Donna Rose Addis; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

10.  Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Ling Pan; Regina Musicaro; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.