Literature DB >> 23002343

"Extended" radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: long-term outcomes, indications and limitations.

Yoshio Shirai1, Jun Sakata, Toshifumi Wakai, Taku Ohashi, Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama.   

Abstract

AIM: To delineate indications and limitations for "extended" radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a procedure which was instituted in our department in 1982.
METHODS: Of 145 patients who underwent a radical resection for gallbladder cancer from 1982 through 2006, 52 (36%) had an extended radical cholecystectomy, which involved en bloc resection of the gallbladder, gallbladder fossa, extrahepatic bile duct, and the regional lymph nodes (first- and second-echelon node groups). A retrospective analysis of the 52 patients was conducted including at least 5 years of follow up. Residual tumor status was judged as no residual tumor (R0) or microscopic/macroscopic residual tumor (R1-2). Pathological findings were documented according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition).
RESULTS: The primary tumor was classified as pathological T1 (pT1) in 3 patients, pT2 in 36, pT3 in 12, and pT4 in 1. Twenty-three patients had lymph node metastases; 11 had a single positive node, 4 had two positive nodes, and 8 had three or more positive nodes. None of the three patients with pT1 tumors had nodal disease, whereas 23 of 49 (47%) with pT2 or more advanced tumors had nodal disease. One patient died during the hospital stay for definitive resection, giving an in-hospital mortality rate of 2%. Overall survival (OS) after extended radical cholecystectomy was 65% at 5 years and 53% at 10 years in all 52 patients. OS differed according to the pT classification (P < 0.001) and the nodal status (P = 0.010). All of 3 patients with pT1 tumors and most (29 of 36) patients with pT2 tumors survived for more than 5 years. Of 12 patients with pT3 tumors, 8 who had an R1-2 resection, distant metastasis, or extensive extrahepatic organ involvement died soon after resection. Of the remaining four pT3 patients who had localized hepatic spread through the gallbladder fossa and underwent an R0 resection, 2 survived for more than 5 years and another survived for 4 years and 2 mo. The only patient with pT4 tumor died of disease soon after resection. Among 23 node-positive patients, 11 survived for more than 5 years, and of these, 10 had a modest degree of nodal disease (one or two positive nodes).
CONCLUSION: Extended radical cholecystectomy is indicated for pT2 tumors and some pT3 tumors with localized hepatic invasion, provided that the regional nodal disease is limited to a modest degree (up to two positive nodes). Extensive pT3 disease, pT4 disease, or marked nodal disease appears to be beyond the scope of this radical procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct resection; Gallbladder neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Lymph node excision; Prognosis; Radical surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23002343      PMCID: PMC3442212          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i34.4736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  23 in total

1.  Carcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary tract.

Authors:  F GLENN; D M M HAYS
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Identification of the regional lymphatic system of the gallbladder by vital staining.

Authors:  Y Shirai; K Yoshida; K Tsukada; T Ohtani; T Muto
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The role of lymph node dissection in the treatment of gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  H Shimada; I Endo; S Togo; A Nakano; T Izumi; G Nakagawara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Retrospective analysis of 70 operations for gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; K Chijiiwa; S Saiki; K Nishihara; M Takashima; K Kawakami; M Tanaka
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Inapparent carcinoma of the gallbladder. An appraisal of a radical second operation after simple cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Y Shirai; K Yoshida; K Tsukada; T Muto
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Long-term results after curative resection for carcinoma of the gallbladder. French University Association for Surgical Research.

Authors:  S Benoist; Y Panis; P L Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer. Implications for staging and management.

Authors:  D L Bartlett; Y Fong; J G Fortner; M F Brennan; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Radical surgery for gallbladder carcinoma. Long-term results.

Authors:  Y Shirai; K Yoshida; K Tsukada; T Muto; H Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Hepatic metastases from carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Y Shirai; K Tsukada; T Ohtani; H Watanabe; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Ischemic biliary stricture due to lymph node dissection in the hepatoduodenal ligament.

Authors:  D Ishizuka; Y Shirai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec
View more
  9 in total

1.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Tae Wook Kang; Dong Ik Cha; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Kee-Taek Jang; Soo Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Risk factors of lymphatic metastasis complement poor radiological detection in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Tu-Nan Yu; Bo Shen; Ning Meng; Hong Yu; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the gallbladder: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xu Ren; Hong Jiang; Kan Sun; Xufu Qin; Yongping Qu; Tian Xia; Yan Chen
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.196

4.  Surgical procedure determination based on tumor-node-metastasis staging of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong He; Jing-Jing Li; Wei Liu; Qiang Qu; Tao Hong; Xie-Qun Xu; Bing-Lu Li; Ying Wang; Hai-Tao Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of gallbladder carcinoma: a critical review.

Authors:  Farzad Kakaei; Samad Beheshtirouy; Seyed Mohammadreza Nejatollahi; Sina Zarrintan; Mohammad Reza Mafi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 6.  To Resect or Not to Resect Extrahepatic Bile Duct in Gallbladder Cancer?

Authors:  Paschalis Gavriilidis; Alan Askari; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-12-31

7.  Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer: An eight-year experience in a single center.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kamada; Tomohide Hori; Hidekazu Yamamoto; Hideki Harada; Michihiro Yamamoto; Masahiro Yamada; Takefumi Yazawa; Masaki Tani; Asahi Sato; Ryotaro Tani; Ryuhei Aoyama; Yudai Sasaki; Masazumi Zaima
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2020-09-27

8.  Effects of Surgical Methods and Tumor Location on Survival and Recurrence Patterns after Curative Resection in Patients with T2 Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Woohyun Jung; Jin-Young Jang; Mee Joo Kang; Ye Rim Chang; Yong Chan Shin; Jihoon Chang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Survival benefits of simple versus extended cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy for patients with T1b gallbladder cancer: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (2004 to 2013).

Authors:  Li Xu; Haidong Tan; Xiaolei Liu; Jia Huang; Liguo Liu; Shuang Si; Yongliang Sun; Wenying Zhou; Zhiying Yang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.