Literature DB >> 23002281

Discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer has a prognostic impact: a single-institution analysis.

M V Dieci1, E Barbieri, F Piacentini, G Ficarra, S Bettelli, M Dominici, P F Conte, V Guarneri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer progression. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent histological sampling of suspected breast cancer recurrence. All the pathology assessments [ER, PgR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on both primaries and confirmed recurrences were performed at the same laboratory.
RESULTS: A breast cancer recurrence was confirmed in 119 cases. Rates of discordance were 13.4%, 39% and 11.8% for ER, PgR and HER2, respectively. Ninety-two patients maintained the same tumor phenotype [i.e. the same hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status], whereas 27 (22.7%) changed during progression. The loss of HR positivity and the loss of HER2 positivity resulted in a worse post-recurrence survival (P=0.01 and P=0.008, respectively) and overall survival (OS; P=0.06 and P=0.0002, respectively), compared with the corresponding concordant-positive cases. Tumor phenotype discordance was associated with worse post-recurrence and OS (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively); those cases who turned into triple-negative experienced the poorest outcome, respect to the concordant group (P=0.001, OS).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated for the first time an impact on OS of phenotype discordance between primary breast cancer and relapse. Among discordant cases, receptor loss resulted in the main determinant of poorer outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23002281     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  61 in total

1.  The variation and clinical significance of hormone receptors and Her-2 status from primary to metastatic lesions in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yan-Yun Zhu; Wen Si; Tie-Feng Ji; Xiao-Qin Guo; Yi Hu; Jun-Lan Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 2.  Incorporation of biomarkers in phase II studies of recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Toni Rose Jue; Elizabeth Hovey; Sara Davis; Oliver Carleton; Kerrie L McDonald
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-12-23

Review 3.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.

Authors:  Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Triple-negative breast cancer that progressed as estrogen receptor-positive skin metastases.

Authors:  Sang Min Lee; Eun Jin Kang; Ju Hee Kim; Jong Min Yun; Der Sheng Sun; Yoon Ho Ko; Hye Sung Won
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 5.  Insights into Molecular Classifications of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Selection for Treatment.

Authors:  Ana C Garrido-Castro; Nancy U Lin; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Breast Cancer Biomarkers: Utility in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Fanny Le Du; Naoto T Ueno; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2013-12

7.  Prognostic implications of receptor discordance between primary and recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  Akiko Matsumoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Takeshi Murata; Tomoko Seki; Maiko Takahashi; Tetsu Hayashida; Kaori Kameyama; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Role of MGMT Methylation Status at Time of Diagnosis and Recurrence for Patients with Glioblastoma: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Alexandro Paccapelo; Giovanni Tallini; Dario De Biase; Claudio Ghimenton; Daniela Danieli; Elena Zunarelli; Giovanni Lanza; Enrico Maria Silini; Carmelo Sturiale; Lorenzo Volpin; Franco Servadei; Andrea Talacchi; Antonio Fioravanti; Maria Pia Foschini; Stefania Bartolini; Annalisa Pession; Mario Ermani
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-03-08

9.  ARID1A determines luminal identity and therapeutic response in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Guotai Xu; Sagar Chhangawala; Emiliano Cocco; Pedram Razavi; Yanyan Cai; Jordan E Otto; Lorenzo Ferrando; Pier Selenica; Erik Ladewig; Carmen Chan; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Matthew Witkin; Yuanming Cheng; Jane Park; Cristian Serna-Tamayo; HuiYong Zhao; Fan Wu; Mirna Sallaku; Xuan Qu; Alison Zhao; Clayton K Collings; Andrew R D'Avino; Komal Jhaveri; Richard Koche; Ross L Levine; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Cigall Kadoch; Maurizio Scaltriti; Christina S Leslie; José Baselga; Eneda Toska
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Discordance in hormone receptor status among primary, metastatic, and second primary breast cancers: biological difference or misclassification?

Authors:  Dominique Sighoko; Juxin Liu; Ningqi Hou; Paul Gustafson; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.