BACKGROUND: Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer progression. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent histological sampling of suspected breast cancer recurrence. All the pathology assessments [ER, PgR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on both primaries and confirmed recurrences were performed at the same laboratory. RESULTS: A breast cancer recurrence was confirmed in 119 cases. Rates of discordance were 13.4%, 39% and 11.8% for ER, PgR and HER2, respectively. Ninety-two patients maintained the same tumor phenotype [i.e. the same hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status], whereas 27 (22.7%) changed during progression. The loss of HR positivity and the loss of HER2 positivity resulted in a worse post-recurrence survival (P=0.01 and P=0.008, respectively) and overall survival (OS; P=0.06 and P=0.0002, respectively), compared with the corresponding concordant-positive cases. Tumor phenotype discordance was associated with worse post-recurrence and OS (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively); those cases who turned into triple-negative experienced the poorest outcome, respect to the concordant group (P=0.001, OS). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated for the first time an impact on OS of phenotype discordance between primary breast cancer and relapse. Among discordant cases, receptor loss resulted in the main determinant of poorer outcome.
BACKGROUND:Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer progression. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent histological sampling of suspected breast cancer recurrence. All the pathology assessments [ER, PgR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on both primaries and confirmed recurrences were performed at the same laboratory. RESULTS: A breast cancer recurrence was confirmed in 119 cases. Rates of discordance were 13.4%, 39% and 11.8% for ER, PgR and HER2, respectively. Ninety-two patients maintained the same tumor phenotype [i.e. the same hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status], whereas 27 (22.7%) changed during progression. The loss of HR positivity and the loss of HER2 positivity resulted in a worse post-recurrence survival (P=0.01 and P=0.008, respectively) and overall survival (OS; P=0.06 and P=0.0002, respectively), compared with the corresponding concordant-positive cases. Tumor phenotype discordance was associated with worse post-recurrence and OS (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively); those cases who turned into triple-negative experienced the poorest outcome, respect to the concordant group (P=0.001, OS). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated for the first time an impact on OS of phenotype discordance between primary breast cancer and relapse. Among discordant cases, receptor loss resulted in the main determinant of poorer outcome.
Authors: Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Sang Min Lee; Eun Jin Kang; Ju Hee Kim; Jong Min Yun; Der Sheng Sun; Yoon Ho Ko; Hye Sung Won Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.884
Authors: Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Alexandro Paccapelo; Giovanni Tallini; Dario De Biase; Claudio Ghimenton; Daniela Danieli; Elena Zunarelli; Giovanni Lanza; Enrico Maria Silini; Carmelo Sturiale; Lorenzo Volpin; Franco Servadei; Andrea Talacchi; Antonio Fioravanti; Maria Pia Foschini; Stefania Bartolini; Annalisa Pession; Mario Ermani Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-03-08
Authors: Guotai Xu; Sagar Chhangawala; Emiliano Cocco; Pedram Razavi; Yanyan Cai; Jordan E Otto; Lorenzo Ferrando; Pier Selenica; Erik Ladewig; Carmen Chan; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Matthew Witkin; Yuanming Cheng; Jane Park; Cristian Serna-Tamayo; HuiYong Zhao; Fan Wu; Mirna Sallaku; Xuan Qu; Alison Zhao; Clayton K Collings; Andrew R D'Avino; Komal Jhaveri; Richard Koche; Ross L Levine; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Cigall Kadoch; Maurizio Scaltriti; Christina S Leslie; José Baselga; Eneda Toska Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 38.330